A preclinical evaluation was conducted to evaluate the performance of the Cepheid Xpert assay on 135 lower respiratory tract secretions for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and S. aureus. Compared with the quantitative culture, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 99.0%, 72.2%, 90.7%, and 96.3%, respectively. V entilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates (15, 18), particularly in those patients who receive inadequate antimicrobial treatment (8,19). Microbiologic information in patients with suspicion of VAP relies mainly on the quantitative culture of lower respiratory tract (LRT) secretions, and conventional bacterial isolation, identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing takes no less than 48 to 72 h. Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are important etiologic agents of VAP and account for variable proportions that range from 19.5% to 34.4% of all episodes in different regions (3,4,9). Empirical treatment of VAP in many institutions requires the administration of potentially toxic or costly anti-MRSA antibiotics, such as vancomycin or linezolid.Rapid molecular diagnostic tests for VAP are an unmet medical need recently acknowledged by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) (1). In past years, the automated Cepheid Xpert MRSA/SA SSTI real-time PCR assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) has been FDA and CE (European Community) approved for the simultaneous detection of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA in skin and soft tissue infection swabs and blood cultures (21). This test has also been used directly on perioperative bone and joint samples for the diagnosis of osteoarticular infections (7). The use of the assay for the direct detection of MSSA and MRSA in LRT secretions in the diagnosis of VAP is an off-label use not endorsed by the manufacturer, and to the best of our knowledge, this assay has not yet been evaluated in this setting.We conducted a preclinical comparison of Xpert MRSA/SA assay to the gold standard, the quantitative culture method, in order to evaluate the performance of this assay directly on LRT secretions from patients with suspicion of VAP. Over a period of 15 months, all LRT samples (endotracheal aspirates) received in the microbiology laboratory from patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) of our hospital and suspected of having VAP were examined by Gram stain and routinely cultured onto sheep blood, chocolate, and McConkey agar plates by the standard quantitative culture technique, which was considered the gold standard method. Plates were incubated for 18 to 24 h at 35 Ϯ 2°C aerobically and in 5% CO 2 (chocolate agar) (22). Colony counts of Ն10 4 CFU/ml of either MRSA or MSSA were considered significant and a positive test result (quantitative culture), whereas counts below 10 4 CFU/ml of either MRSA or MSSA were considered a negative test result (qualitative culture) (2). The absence of gro...