In this article we have made an attempt to comprehend the subject area of technosphere studies. First of all, with these purposes there was carried out the methodological analysis of the basic concepts, principles and notions of technosphere knowledge existing in the modern scientific literature; critical assessment is given. On this basis we suggest new structure of the subject area grounds and object of cognition as a criterion of determination of the subject of technosphere knowledge and its structure. For this there was applied the principle of unity of the cognition subject and object as a criterion of determination of technosphere knowledge subject and its structure. Then it’s created a picture of technosphere reality and its fundamental and general scientific principles and notions are formed: technosphere, technology, technosphere evolution, technosphere and technical activities, technosphere safety, technosphere ecology etc. The system model of the subject area of technosphere studies is constructed on such a methodological base.
This paper studies methodological ways of formation of sociopsychological aspects of environmental consciousness. To this end, environmental psychology is singled out as the most important sociological factor in the internal structure of environmental consciousness. To clarify this problem, the article conducts a methodological analysis of the subject of environmental psychology, studies its links with values, the information environmental field, the subjective relationship of a person with the natural world, the dependence of environmental psychology on everyday environmental consciousness and cognition. From these systemic positions the subject of environmental consciousness, its place and role in environmental consciousness and environmental culture as a whole is determined.
In the present scientific paper, methodological ways of formation of systemic grounds of the modern concept of social management are studied. For these purposes, in the beginning of the paper, a critical analysis of different interpretations of social management, existing in modern science, is carried out, as well as system ways of overcoming methodological difficulties in formation and development of the theory of social management are determined. Then, in the paper, system principles of the modern concept of social management are identified and clarified. They are principles of objectivity, integrity, self-organisation, subordination, social activity of a human being and society as a whole, selfmanagement, self-development, social sustainable development, etc. In the paper, special attention is given to disclosure of the content and the structure of new trends in modern science -synergetic and cybernetic movements. At that, initially, the connection between the synergetic movement and backbone principles of organisation and self-organisation of complex self-managed systems of inanimate, animate and social nature is clarified. In the paper, the cybernetic movement, its connection with selfmanagement, management, self-development and information of complex social systems are also comprehended. In the paper, an integrate model of social management is constructed on such methodological grounds. In conclusion, the importance and necessity of elaboration of this problem for deeper and complete comprehension of common regularities of organisation, functioning and development of the social world as a whole are emphasised.
Authors of the given scientific article attempt systematically comprehend the subject area of space research. For these purposes, the role of the principle of unity of object and subject matter in the formation of the cosmology object and its structure is first revealed. Using a mental experiment, a picture of cosmic reality and its fundamental and general scientific concepts and principles are created. On this methodological basis, a holistic model of the subject area of space knowledge is constructed.The space reality sciences are of particular interest, methodological complexity and value. An important place among them has the problem of the subject area of space research formation. To solve it, in modern astronomy it is necessary to apply new methods of knowledge. A method of systematic philosophical analysis in this subject area knowledge is a leading one. At the same time, the systematic-philosophical analysis and the appropriate approach to the study of the subject area of astronomy allows identifying and justifying cosmology as an integral system of knowledge.The ontological foundations of modern astronomical knowledge allow us deeply comprehend the objective world, cosmic reality as a self-organizing and self-developing system, and also help lay the foundation for the construction of an integral model of the subject of modern space science.Modern astronomical science faces important epistemological and logic-methodological challenges: find out what is the subject and the structure of cosmos science. This type of analysis is associated with the reconstruction of the subject in its integrity and consistency. Keywords -object of space exploration; subject of space'scognition; the structure of thecosmology subject; the picture of cosmic reality; the cosmos; cosmic evolution; non-standard model of the Universe; system analysis; cosmic thinking style.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.