Background: Pulmonary atelectasis in anesthetized children is easily reverted by lung recruitment maneuvers. However, the high airways pressure reached during the maneuver could negatively affect hemodynamics. The aim of this study is to assess the effect and feasibility of a postural lung recruitment maneuver (P-RM); i.e., a new maneuver that opens up the atelectatic lung areas based on changing the child's body position under constant ventilation with moderated driving pressure (12 cmH 2 O) and of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP, 10 cmH 2 O). Forty ASA I-II children, aged 6 months to 7 years, subjected to general anesthesia were studied. Patients were ventilated with volume control mode using standard settings with 5 cmH 2 O of PEEP. They were randomized into two groups: (1) control group (C group, n = 20)-ventilation was turned to pressure control ventilation using a fixed driving pressure of 12 cmH 2 O. PEEP was increased from 5 to 10 cmH 2 O during 3 min maintaining the supine position. (2) P-RM group (n = 20)-patients received the same increase in driving pressure and PEEP, but they were placed, respectively, in the left lateral position, in the right lateral position (90 s each), and back again into the supine position after 3 min. Then, ventilation returned to baseline settings in volume control mode. Lung ultrasound-derived aeration score and respiratory compliance were assessed before (T1) and after (T2) 10 cmH 2 O of PEEP was applied. Results: At baseline ventilation (T1), both groups showed similar aeration score (P-RM group 9.9 ± 1.9 vs C group 10.4 ± 1.9; p = 0.463) and respiratory compliance (P-RM group 15 ± 6 vs C group 14 ± 6 mL/cmH 2 O; p = 0.517). At T2, the aeration score decreased in the P-RM group (1.5 ± 1.6 vs 9.9 ± 2.1; p < 0.001), but remained without changes in the C group (9.9 ± 2.1; p = 0.221). Compliance was higher in the P-RM group (18 ± 6 mL/cmH 2 O) when compared with the C group (14 ± 5 mL/cmH 2 O; p = 0.001). Conclusion: Lung aeration and compliance improved only in the group in which a posture change strategy was applied.
BACKGROUND
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) prevents peri-operative atelectasis in adults, but its effect in children has not been quantified.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of CPAP in preventing postinduction and postoperative atelectasis in children under general anaesthesia.
DESIGN
A randomised controlled study.
SETTING
Single-institution study, community hospital, Mar del Plata. Argentina.
PATIENTS
We studied 42 children, aged 6 months to 7 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I, under standardised general anaesthesia.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients were randomised into two groups: Control group (n = 21): induction and emergence of anaesthesia without CPAP; and CPAP group (n = 21): 5 cmH2O of CPAP during induction and emergence of anaesthesia. Lung ultrasound (LUS) imaging was performed before and 5 min after anaesthesia induction. Children without atelectasis were ventilated in the same manner as the Control group with standard ventilatory settings including 5 cmH2O of PEEP. Children with atelectasis received a recruitment manoeuvre followed by standard ventilation with 8 cmH2O of PEEP. Then, at the end of surgery, LUS images were repeated before tracheal extubation and 60 min after awakening.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Lung aeration score and atelectasis assessed by LUS.
RESULTS
Before anaesthesia, all children were free of atelectasis. After induction, 95% in the Control group developed atelectasis compared with 52% of patients in the CPAP group (P < 0.0001). LUS aeration scores were higher (impaired aeration) in the Control group than the CPAP group (8.8 ± 3.8 vs. 3.5 ± 3.3 points; P < 0.0001). At the end of surgery, before tracheal extubation, atelectasis was observed in 100% of children in the Control and 29% of the CPAP group (P < 0.0001) with a corresponding aeration score of 9.6 ± 3.2 and 1.8 ± 2.3, respectively (P < 0.0001). After surgery, 30% of children in the Control group and 10% in the CPAP group presented with residual atelectasis (P < 0.0001) also corresponding to a higher aeration score in the Control group (2.5 ± 3.1) when compared with the CPAP group (0.5 ± 1.5; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
The use of 5 cmH2O of CPAP in healthy children of the studied age span during induction and emergence of anaesthesia effectively prevents atelectasis, with benefits maintained during the first postoperative hour.
TRIAL REGISTRY
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03461770.
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Detrás de las acciones y estrategias de las personas para aprender o enseñar, existe un cuerpo teórico noexplícito, que se configura a partir de un conjunto de supuestos coherentes o incoherentes entre sí, en fun-ción de la relación que exista entre lo que el sujeto dice y lo que hace. Estas representaciones implícitas surgen no sólo de la educación formal recibida, sino de la propia historia educativa de cada sujeto y, en el caso de los docentes, orientan de un modo u otro su práctica, tal como lo indican numerosas investi-gaciones sobre el tema. En este trabajo se analizan las concepciones sobre el aprendizaje y la utilización de estrategias metacognitivas de dos grupos de estudiantes universitarios de profesorado, provenientes de distintas áreas disciplinares: ciencias humanas y ciencias exactas. Los resultados muestran dependencia de las concepciones de aprendizaje con respecto al dominio de formación disciplinar, situación que se da sólo parcialmente en el caso de la utilización de estrategias metacognitivas.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.