No abstract

A pandemia de COVID-19 impactou comportamentos, relacionamentos e trabalho.O teletrabalho se tornou fundamental para evitar a disseminação da doença. O objetivodeste artigo foi compreender os aspectos ergonômicos em trabalhadores do setoradministrativos no teletrabalho. Trata-se de um estudo de revisão bibliográfica integrativa,a busca realizada em bases de dados com descritores. Os critérios de seleção dos artigosforam baseados em data, população e palavras-chave. Inicialmente, eram 56 artigos e,conforme os critérios, passaram a ser 17 artigos. Concluiu-se que o setor administrativovem adequando-se ergonomicamente, embora ainda haja dificuldades quanto à gestão eà segurança e saúde.

Background Alternative measures for minimizing musculoskeletal pain, such as telerehabilitation, can be implemented in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective The aim of the present overview was to examine evidence from systematic reviews of telerehabilitation for managing musculoskeletal pain. Methods This study was conducted following the PRISMA recommendations. Searches were conducted of the Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Embase databases for review articles published from the inception of the database to July 2022. To be included, the studies needed to be a systematic review, include any type of telerehabilitation and present any outcome related to musculoskeletal pain. Studies not available in English were excluded. Theses, dissertations, letters, conference abstracts and narrative reviews were also excluded. The methodological quality of the reviews was appraised using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews criteria. Data extraction was performed by two reviewers and included the characterization of the clinical condition and telerehabilitation program, main outcomes, method for appraising the methodological quality of the primary studies, results and quality of evidence. Results The search led to the retrieval of 390 potentially eligible studies and 16 systematic reviews were included in this overview. Eleven reviews had meta-analyses and most had high methodological quality. Five of six systematic reviews reported evidence supporting the telehealth intervention for chronic pain conditions; and two of three high-quality systematic reviews reported the absence of evidence for non-specific low back pain. Conclusions This overview of systematic reviews enables a better understanding of the characteristics of telerehabilitation programs, provides information for use in clinical practice and describes gaps in the research that need to be filled.