Aims/hypothesis A reliable method for in vivo quantification of pancreatic beta cell mass (BCM) could lead to further insight into the pathophysiology of diabetes. The glucagonlike peptide 1 receptor, abundantly expressed on beta cells, may be a suitable target for imaging. We investigated the potential of radiotracer imaging with the GLP-1 analogue exendin labelled with indium-111 for determination of BCM in vivo in a rodent model of beta cell loss and in patients with type 1 diabetes and healthy individuals. MethodsThe targeting of 111 In-labelled exendin was examined in a rat model of alloxan-induced beta cell loss. Rats were injected with 15 MBq 111 In-labelled exendin and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) acquisition was performed 1 h post injection, followed by dissection, biodistribution and ex vivo autoradiography studies of pancreatic sections. BCM was determined by morphometric analysis after staining with an anti-insulin antibody. For clinical evaluation SPECT was acquired 4, 24 and 48 h after injection of 150 MBq 111 In-labelled exendin in five patients with type 1 Maarten Brom and Wietske Woliner-van der Weg contributed equally to this study. Diabetologia (2014) 57:950-959 DOI 10.1007 diabetes and five healthy individuals. The tracer uptake was determined by quantitative analysis of the SPECT images. Results In rats, 111 In-labelled exendin specifically targets the beta cells and pancreatic uptake is highly correlated with BCM. In humans, the pancreas was visible in SPECT images and the pancreatic uptake showed high interindividual variation with a substantially lower uptake in patients with type 1 diabetes. Conclusions/interpretation These studies indicate that 111 Inlabelled exendin may be suitable for non-invasive quantification of BCM.

The alpha v beta 3 integrin, a transmembrane heterodimeric protein expressed on sprouting endothelial cells, binds to the arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) amino acid sequence of extracellular matrix proteins such as vitronectin. Growing malignant tumors continuously require angiogenesis. As a result, alpha v beta 3 is preferentially expressed in growing tumors and is a potential target for radiolabeled RGD-peptides. In this study we compared the tumor targeting characteristics of a monomeric radiolabeled RGD-peptide with those of a dimeric analogue. Both peptides were radiolabeled with 99mTc via the hydrazinoni-cotinamid (= HYNIC) moiety to form 99mTc-HYNIC-c(RGDfK) and 99mTc-HYNIC-E-[c(RGDfK)]2. In vitro, the IC50 showed a 10-fold higher affinity of the dimer for the alpha v beta 3 integrin as compared to the monomer (0.1 vs. 1.0 nM). In athymic female BALB/c mice with subcutaneously growing OVCAR-3 ovarian carcinoma xenografts, tumor uptake peaked at 5.8 +/- 0.7% ID/g and 5.2 +/- 0.6% ID/g for the dimer and the monomer, respectively. At 1, 2, and 4 h postinjection (p.i.) uptake of the dimer in the tumor was significantly higher than that of the monomeric analogue. Tumor-to-blood ratios were highest at 24 h p.i. at a value of 63 for both compounds. At all timepoints kidney retention of the dimer was significantly higher as compared to kidney retention of the monomer. In conclusion, in this mouse model the dimeric RGD-peptide showed better retention in the tumor than the monomeric analogue, most likely due to the bivalent interaction with the target cell. Furthermore, kidney retention of the dimeric peptide was higher than that of the monomeric peptide.

Arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) peptides preferentially bind to

Dopamine is central to a number of cognitive functions and brain disorders. Given the cost of neurochemical imaging in humans, behavioural proxy measures of dopamine have gained in popularity in the past decade, such as spontaneous eye blink rate (sEBR). Increased sEBR is commonly associated with increased dopamine function based on pharmacological evidence and patient studies. Yet, this hypothesis has not been validated using in vivo measures of dopamine function in humans. To fill this gap, we measured sEBR and striatal dopamine synthesis capacity using [18F]DOPA PET in 20 participants (nine healthy individuals and 11 pathological gamblers). Our results, based on frequentist and Bayesian statistics, as well as region‐of‐interest and voxel‐wise analyses, argue against a positive relationship between sEBR and striatal dopamine synthesis capacity. They show that, if anything, the evidence is in favour of a negative relationship. These results, which complement findings from a recent study that failed to observe a relationship between sEBR and dopamine D2 receptor availability, suggest that caution and nuance are warranted when interpreting sEBR in terms of a proxy measure of striatal dopamine.

No profound deficits were found in the current study. The present results demonstrate that HIV has a minor impact on brain, cognition and wellbeing among HIV-infected patients who are otherwise healthy and maintained on a good control of cART.

Taken together, these results provide empirical evidence for increased striatal dopamine synthesis in pathological gambling.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to determine the agreement of two noninvasive methods, a self-report and a field study method, for the assessment of impaired hypoglycemia awareness with a gold standard criterion of hypoglycemia awareness, the autonomic symptom threshold during experimental hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 19 type 1 diabetic patients completed a standardized questionnaire to assess impaired hypoglycemia awareness and performed a hand-held computer (HHC) study to assess their recognition of hypoglycemic episodes occurring during 24 weeks. Patients subsequently underwent a stepped hypoglycemic clamp to study responses to standardized hypoglycemia. Diagnoses of impaired hypoglycemia awareness were based on the separate self-report questions, a composite self-report score, and three different cutoff levels for the percentage of accurately recognized hypoglycemic episodes during the field study Agreement of these noninvasive measures with the hypoglycemic clamp measure were tested by calculating kappa values, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: The composite self-report score agreed reasonably well with the hypoglycemic clamp measure (kappa 0.49, sensitivity 66.7%, and specificity 85.7%) and showed a better agreement than the separate self-report questions. The HHC criterion of impaired hypoglycemia awareness did not agree with the hypoglycemic clamp criterion at any of the cutoff levels tested. CONCLUSIONS: The composite self-report tested in this study is a reasonably reliable assessment method for the diagnosis of impaired hypoglycemia awareness, using the physiological definition of an absence of autonomic symptoms at a blood glucose level of 3 mmol/l. In contrast, the recognition of hypoglycemic events in everyday life as measured using the HHC method is not related to the hypoglycemic clamp criterion.

The gold standard for evaluating cognitive impairments in HIV-infected patients is to administer an extensive neuropsychological assessment. This may, however, be time-consuming and hence not always feasible in the clinic. Therefore, several brief screening tools have been developed. This study determined the validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the HIV Dementia Scale (HDS) in detecting cognitive impairment using both the Frascati and cognitive impairment, no dementia (CIND) criteria to classify cognitive impairment in HIV-1 infected patients. The MoCA, HDS, and an extensive neuropsychological assessment, covering nine cognitive domains, were administered in a group of 102 HIV-infected patients who were all on cART and virologically suppressed for at least 1 year. Results show that the areas under the curve (AUCs) for both the MoCA and the HDS were statistically significant, using both the Frascati and the CIND criteria as gold standard. However, the AUCs for the MoCA and HDS did not differ significantly, regardless of the used classification criteria (Frascati: z = 0.37, p = 0.35; CIND: z = −0.62, p = 0.27). Sensitivity of both the MoCA and HDS were low for the recommended cutoff scores (Frascati: MoCA (<26) = 0.56, HDS (<11) = 0.26; CIND: MoCA (<26) = 0.55, HDS (<11) = 0.36). Cutoff scores with good sensitivity and adequate specificity could not be determined for both screening instruments. Therefore, the HDS and MoCA are not recommended as sole instruments to diagnose HIV-associated cognitive impairment.