Aims/hypothesis A reliable method for in vivo quantification of pancreatic beta cell mass (BCM) could lead to further insight into the pathophysiology of diabetes. The glucagonlike peptide 1 receptor, abundantly expressed on beta cells, may be a suitable target for imaging. We investigated the potential of radiotracer imaging with the GLP-1 analogue exendin labelled with indium-111 for determination of BCM in vivo in a rodent model of beta cell loss and in patients with type 1 diabetes and healthy individuals. MethodsThe targeting of 111 In-labelled exendin was examined in a rat model of alloxan-induced beta cell loss. Rats were injected with 15 MBq 111 In-labelled exendin and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) acquisition was performed 1 h post injection, followed by dissection, biodistribution and ex vivo autoradiography studies of pancreatic sections. BCM was determined by morphometric analysis after staining with an anti-insulin antibody. For clinical evaluation SPECT was acquired 4, 24 and 48 h after injection of 150 MBq 111 In-labelled exendin in five patients with type 1 Maarten Brom and Wietske Woliner-van der Weg contributed equally to this study. Diabetologia (2014) 57:950-959 DOI 10.1007 diabetes and five healthy individuals. The tracer uptake was determined by quantitative analysis of the SPECT images. Results In rats, 111 In-labelled exendin specifically targets the beta cells and pancreatic uptake is highly correlated with BCM. In humans, the pancreas was visible in SPECT images and the pancreatic uptake showed high interindividual variation with a substantially lower uptake in patients with type 1 diabetes. Conclusions/interpretation These studies indicate that 111 Inlabelled exendin may be suitable for non-invasive quantification of BCM.

The alpha v beta 3 integrin, a transmembrane heterodimeric protein expressed on sprouting endothelial cells, binds to the arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) amino acid sequence of extracellular matrix proteins such as vitronectin. Growing malignant tumors continuously require angiogenesis. As a result, alpha v beta 3 is preferentially expressed in growing tumors and is a potential target for radiolabeled RGD-peptides. In this study we compared the tumor targeting characteristics of a monomeric radiolabeled RGD-peptide with those of a dimeric analogue. Both peptides were radiolabeled with 99mTc via the hydrazinoni-cotinamid (= HYNIC) moiety to form 99mTc-HYNIC-c(RGDfK) and 99mTc-HYNIC-E-[c(RGDfK)]2. In vitro, the IC50 showed a 10-fold higher affinity of the dimer for the alpha v beta 3 integrin as compared to the monomer (0.1 vs. 1.0 nM). In athymic female BALB/c mice with subcutaneously growing OVCAR-3 ovarian carcinoma xenografts, tumor uptake peaked at 5.8 +/- 0.7% ID/g and 5.2 +/- 0.6% ID/g for the dimer and the monomer, respectively. At 1, 2, and 4 h postinjection (p.i.) uptake of the dimer in the tumor was significantly higher than that of the monomeric analogue. Tumor-to-blood ratios were highest at 24 h p.i. at a value of 63 for both compounds. At all timepoints kidney retention of the dimer was significantly higher as compared to kidney retention of the monomer. In conclusion, in this mouse model the dimeric RGD-peptide showed better retention in the tumor than the monomeric analogue, most likely due to the bivalent interaction with the target cell. Furthermore, kidney retention of the dimeric peptide was higher than that of the monomeric peptide.

Arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) peptides preferentially bind to

Dopamine is central to a number of cognitive functions and brain disorders. Given the cost of neurochemical imaging in humans, behavioural proxy measures of dopamine have gained in popularity in the past decade, such as spontaneous eye blink rate (sEBR). Increased sEBR is commonly associated with increased dopamine function based on pharmacological evidence and patient studies. Yet, this hypothesis has not been validated using in vivo measures of dopamine function in humans. To fill this gap, we measured sEBR and striatal dopamine synthesis capacity using [18F]DOPA PET in 20 participants (nine healthy individuals and 11 pathological gamblers). Our results, based on frequentist and Bayesian statistics, as well as region‐of‐interest and voxel‐wise analyses, argue against a positive relationship between sEBR and striatal dopamine synthesis capacity. They show that, if anything, the evidence is in favour of a negative relationship. These results, which complement findings from a recent study that failed to observe a relationship between sEBR and dopamine D2 receptor availability, suggest that caution and nuance are warranted when interpreting sEBR in terms of a proxy measure of striatal dopamine.