Provided achievement of optimal acoustic window, TCLUS can reliably assess disabled VFs with FL reserved for their confirmation or doubtful cases. Subjective assessment of VF mobility should suffice in most cases with additional VFDV estimation reserved pre-operatively for situations with higher risk of VFs disability, and post-operatively when subjective VF assessment findings are discordant from pre-operative status.
Background and Aims:Although volume controlled ventilation (VCV) has been the traditional mode of ventilation in robotic surgery, recently pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) has been used more frequently. However, evidence on whether PCV is superior to VCV is still lacking. We intended to compare the effects of VCV and PCV on respiratory mechanics and haemodynamic in patients undergoing robotic surgeries in steep Trendelenburg position.Methods:This prospective, randomized trial was conducted on sixty patients between 20 and 70 years belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status I–II. Patients were randomly assigned to VCV group (n = 30), where VCV mode was maintained through anaesthesia, or the PCV group (n = 30), where ventilation mode was changed to PCV after the establishment of 40° Trendelenburg position and pneumoperitoneum. Respiratory (peak and mean airway pressure [APpeak, APmean], dynamic lung compliance [Cdyn] and arterial blood gas analysis) and haemodynamics variables (heart rate, mean blood pressure [MBP] central venous pressure) were measured at baseline (T1), post-Trendelenburg position at 60 min (T2), 120 min (T3) and after resuming supine position (T4).Results:Demographic profile, haemodynamic variables, oxygen saturation and minute ventilation (MV) were comparable between two groups. Despite similar values of APmean, APpeak was significantly higher in VCV group at T2 and T3 as compared to PCV group (P < 0.001). Cdyn and PaCO2 were also better in PCV group than in VCV group (P < 0.001 and 0.045, respectively).Conclusion:PCV should be preferred in robotic pelvic surgeries as it offers lower airway pressures, greater Cdyn and a better-preserved ventilation-perfusion matching for the same levels of MV.
Background and Aims:
Cancer chemotherapeutic agents cause alteration in the response to neuromuscular blocking drugs, which can have serious perioperative implications. Magnesium, commonly found to be deficient in these patients, plays an indispensable role in neuromuscular transmission. This study aimed to understand the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the neuromuscular blocking properties of cisatracurium.
Material and Methods:
One hundred female patients scheduled for breast cancer surgery were divided into two groups (n = 50 each). Group B received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with taxane, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide, and Group A did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neuromuscular block following cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg was measured using peripheral nerve stimulator at the ulnar nerve. Onset time, duration of intense block, clinical duration of action, time to TOF4 after the last dose of cisatracurium, along with preoperative serum magnesium concentration were measured. Correlation and multiple regression were run to analyze the relationship between history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, preoperative magnesium, and the abovementioned time points. Mediation analysis was done to ascertain if magnesium was mediating the observed effects.
Results:
Onset time was prolonged by nearly 18% in Group B compared to Group A (P = 0.001). The duration of intense block was 35.27 ± 8.9 min in Group B and 42.07 ± 10.99 min in Group A (P < 0.001). The clinical duration of action of cisatracurium was significantly shorter in Group B (46.06 ± 8.68 min) compared to Group A (55.87 ± 11.04 min, P < 0.001). The time to TOF4 was 32.86 ± 5.66 min in Group B and 36.57 ± 8.49 min in Group A (P < 0.05). Preoperative serum magnesium levels were significantly lower in Group B (P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a delayed onset, shorter duration of action, and faster recovery for cisatracurium. Although preoperative magnesium levels were lower in Group B, it was found to be an independent predictor rather than a mediator of these effects.
Background and Aims:
During robotic pelvic surgeries, the shortening of endotracheal tube (ETT) tip-to-carina distance (D
TC
) during pneumoperitoneum with 45° Trendelenburg position can result in endobronchial tube migration. In the three-point ETT cuff palpation (TPP) technique, maximal ETT cuff distension is felt over the tracheal segment located between the cricoid-thyroid membrane and suprasternal notch, which is likely to provide optimal placement. However, the reproducibility and reliability of the TPP technique in preventing endobronchial tube migration are yet to be evaluated. Hence, we compared three ETT placement techniques: TPP technique, intubation guide mark (IGM) technique and Varshney’s formula (VF) for the prevention of endobronchial tube migration during robotic pelvic surgeries.
Methods:
ETT placement by TPP was compared with IGM and VF techniques in 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class II-III patients, by assessing the serial changes in D
TC
and incidence of endobronchial tube migration throughout the different phases of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position using t-test and Chi-square test. Changes in the D
TC
during various phases were also measured.
Results:
D
TC
(mean ± standard deviation) at baseline and during pneumoperitoneum was significantly better in TPP technique (2.80 ± 0.62 cm and 1.96 ± 0.66 cm) as compared to both IGM (2.50 ± 1.27 cm and 1.41 ± 1.29 cm) and VF techniques (1.83 ± 1.13 cm and 0.98 ± 1.18 cm),
P
< 0.001. During pneumoperitoneum, the mean shortening of D
TC
was 0.84 ± 0.20 cm, and no endobronchial tube migration was found in TPP technique compared to 20% in IGM and 25% in VF techniques,
P
< 0.001.
Conclusion:
TPP is a simple and reliable technique, which provides optimal ETT placement and prevents endobronchial tube migration throughout the different phases of robotic pelvic surgeries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.