No abstract

BackgroundThe outbreaks of bluetongue and Schmallenberg disease in Europe have increased efforts to understand the ecology of Culicoides biting midges and their role in pathogen transmission. However, most studies have focused on a specific habitat, region, or country. To facilitate wider comparisons, and to obtain a better understanding of the spread of disease through Europe, the present study focused on monitoring biting midge species diversity in three different habitat types and three countries across Europe.MethodsBiting midges were trapped using Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute light traps at a total of 27 locations in Sweden, the Netherlands and Italy, comprising farm, peri-urban and wetland habitats. From July 2014 to June 2015 all locations were sampled monthly, except for during the winter months. Trapped midges were counted and identified morphologically. Indices on species richness, evenness and diversity were calculated. Community compositions were analysed using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) techniques.ResultsA total of 50,085 female midges were trapped during 442 collection nights. More than 88% of these belonged to the Obsoletus group. The highest midge diversity was found in Sweden, while species richness was highest in the Netherlands, and most specimens were trapped in Italy. For habitats within countries, diversity of the trapped midges was lowest for farms in all countries. Differences in biting midge species communities were more distinct across the three countries than the three habitat types.ConclusionsA core midge community could be identified, in which the Obsoletus group was the most abundant. Variations in vector communities across countries imply different patterns of disease spread throughout Europe. How specific species and their associated communities affect disease risk is still unclear. Our results emphasize the importance of midge diversity data at community level, how this differs across large geographic range within Europe, and its implications on assessing risks of midge-borne disease outbreaks.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-018-2792-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Running title: Burning and grassland management 60 word "summary of what is exciting about the MS": Within the context of evidence-based conservation, we provide clear evidence that spring burning is not a viable long-term alternative to grazing or mowing. We do this by using odds ratios for finding indicator species, rather than using more traditional methods of vegetation analyses, and by meta-analyses of the outcomes from 11 field trials. 1 Abstract Question:The management of species-rich semi-natural grasslands, a fragmented and threatened vegetation type in Europe, involves costs. Mowing is expensive and grazing can be difficult to achieve and maintain for logistical reasons. Is annual spring burning, potentially cheaper than mowing and grazing, a viable management tool for species-rich grasslands?Location: Long-term field trials in 11 grasslands in southern Sweden. Methods:We calculated the odds for a species being an indicator of good management, an indicator of poor management, and an indicator of nitrogen influence in spring-burnt plots, grazed plots, and annually mowed plots. Odds ratios contrasting spring-burnt plots with grazed plots and spring-burnt plots with mowed plots were subjected to meta-analyses in which we compared the odds ratios after 1, 8, and 14 spring burns. For a single trial, we also analysed data after 1, 8, 14, 28, and 39 spring burns. Results:Compared with mowed and grazed plots, the odds of the four different indicators of good management decreased in spring-burnt plots, while the odds for the two indicators of poor management increased. There was no trend in the two indicators of excess nitrogen. Therefore, the conservation value of vegetation in spring-burnt plots becomes impoverished over time relative to traditional management. Conclusions:Spring burning is not an appropriate long-term management method if the aim is to maintain the conservation value of the vegetation in traditionally managed semi-natural grasslands.

Both agricultural intensification and abandonment have led to the loss of European semi-natural grasslands. Nature conservation management measures like mowing are essential for preserving the biodiversity of remaining grasslands. However, there are no conclusive results from studies examining effects of different mowing frequencies across Europe. To fill this gap, we evaluated data from European studies comparing mowing frequencies to determine which are the most beneficial from a nature conservation viewpoint. We searched literature for short-and long-term studies comparing the effects of different Communicated by David Hawksworth.

Biodiversity often suffers from urbanization. In the present study, we focused on how the length of urbanization affects the richness of 17 epiphytic lichen species and their cover on large oaks in urban environments in a city of 100 000 inhabitants in SE Sweden. We also surveyed trees in adjacent rural areas, selected to have similar distributions of tree trunk circumference and surrounding oak density (within 300 m). Lichen richness and cover were lower on urban trees compared to rural trees. Furthermore, richness and cover decreased with the length of time that urban trees had been surrounded by houses. Most of the species that were analysed demonstrated a decline in occurrence with respect to the duration of housing development. The reduction in the probability of occurrence varied from 60% (Calicium viride, Evernia prunastri), 80% (Chrysothrix candelaris) to 90% (Ramalina spp. Ach.) during the 160-year period of urbanization considered. Therefore, even if valuable trees survive over the course of development, their lichen biota is likely to become depleted over time.

BackgroundStudies on mosquito species diversity in Europe often focus on a specific habitat, region or country. Moreover, different trap types are used for these sampling studies, making it difficult to compare and validate results across Europe. To facilitate comparisons of trapping sites and community analysis, the present study used two trap types for monitoring mosquito species diversity in three habitat types for three different countries in Europe.MethodsMosquitoes were trapped using Biogents Sentinel (BGS), and Mosquito Magnet Liberty Plus (MMLP) traps at a total of 27 locations in Sweden, the Netherlands and Italy, comprising farm, peri-urban and wetland habitats. From July 2014 to June 2015 all locations were sampled monthly, except for the winter months. Indices of species richness, evenness and diversity were calculated, and community analyses were carried out with non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) techniques.ResultsA total of 11,745 female mosquitoes were trapped during 887 collections. More than 90% of the mosquitoes belonged to the genera Culex and Aedes, with Culex pipiens being the most abundant species. The highest mosquito diversity was found in Sweden. Within Sweden, species diversity was highest in wetland habitats, whereas in the Netherlands and Italy this was highest at farms. The NMDS analyses showed clear differences in mosquito communities among countries, but not among habitat types. The MMLP trapped a higher diversity of mosquito species than the BGS traps. Also, MMLP traps trapped higher numbers of mosquitoes, except for the genera Culex and Culiseta in Italy.ConclusionsA core mosquito community could be identified for the three countries, with Culex pipiens as the most abundant species. Differences in mosquito species communities were more defined by the three countries included in the study than by the three habitat types. Differences in mosquito community composition across countries may have implications for disease emergence and further spread throughout Europe. Future research should, therefore, focus on how field data of vector communities can be incorporated into models, to better assess the risk of mosquito-borne disease outbreaks.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-017-2481-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Species‐rich semi‐natural grasslands in Europe are becoming more fragmented and many species that depend on this habitat type are rare and threatened today. Management methods like mowing and grazing are needed to preserve remaining grasslands. Because management is costly it is important to use the most cost‐effective as well as the most beneficial management method, but few studies have compared mowing and grazing. We investigated the effect of mowing and grazing on grassland vegetation using data from 11 long‐term field trials situated in southern Sweden. We calculated the change in the odds of finding species belonging to three different groups of indicators at the start of the treatment and after 8 and 14 years. The used indicator groups were indicators of good management, excess nitrogen and poor management. The results revealed an increase in the odds of finding indicators of good management in mowed plots and an increase in finding indicators of excess nitrogen in grazed plots. The odds of finding indicators of poor management remained unchanged. Results from sub‐analysis of the grazing intensity showed a more negative effect from grazing with low grazing intensity than normal/high grazing intensity. Therefore, mowing is the best long‐term management method for semi‐natural grasslands in Sweden and grazing using a low grazing intensity should be avoided.

Mowing is an important management method for species-rich seminatural grasslands in Europe. Since mowing is costly, it is important to find a balance between mowing frequency and conservation benefits. We compared vegetation data from eleven field trials situated in southern Sweden that involved two mowing regimes, annually and every third year, as well as a no-management control. After approximately 14 years, mowing every third year showed (i) a drop in species richness and Shannon and Gini-Simpson diversity indices, (ii) an increase in woody species, and (iii) increases in tall-grown species. However, there were no apparent changes in (iv) species that were indicative of poor management, nor (v) those indicating good management. For one of the trials, data after 38 years were also evaluated. Compared with annual mowing, there were strong negative changes in the number of species in the untreated control, while the results were conflicting for mowing every third year. In conclusion, the expected loss of conservation values from reduced mowing intensity was 50 to 60% of the loss after abandonment. The outcomes, however, varied among the eleven sites.