Percentage of total length of carcinoma in mm in all cores of a needle biopsy had the strongest predictive positive value for stage >pT2 and risk for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Combined with preoperative PSA and Gleason grade on biopsy may improve the predictive value for stage >pT2.

Our results suggest that the most important and most frequent route of SVI is extraprostatic extension of prostate carcinoma into the soft tissue adjacent to the ipsilateral seminal vesicle and then into the wall of the seminal vesicle.

Objective: There is evidence showing that Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma is one of the most powerful predictors of biological behavior and one of the most influential factors used to determine treatment for prostate cancer. The aim of the current study was to compare the Gleason score for needle biopsy to the Gleason score for the correspondent surgical specimen, find any possible difference in the biochemical (PSA) progression following surgery in upgraded cases, correlate Gleason score in the specimens to several clinicopathologic variables, and compare outcomes between patients with low-grade vs. high-grade Gleason and Gleason scores 3+4 vs. 4+3. Materials and Methods:The study population consisted of 200 consecutive patients submitted to radical prostatectomy. Biochemical progression was defined as PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL. Time to PSA progression was studied using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit analysis. Results: In 47.1% of the cases, there was an exact correlation and 40.6% of cases were underestimated in the biopsies. Half of the tumors graded Gleason 6 at biopsy were Gleason score 7 at surgery. These upgraded tumors had outcomes similar to tumors with Gleason score 7 in both biopsy and surgery. There was a positive correlation of high-grade Gleason score in the surgical specimens to higher preoperative PSA, more extensive tumors, positive margins and more advanced pathologic staging. Tumors with a Gleason score ≥ 7 have lower PSA progression-free survival vs. Gleason scores < 7. In this series, there was no significant difference when comparing Gleason scores of 3+4 vs. 4+3. Conclusions:The findings support the importance of Gleason grading for nomograms, which are used by clinicians to counsel individual patients and help them make important decisions regarding their disease.

The results favor that the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology modified system is a refinement of the Gleason grading and valuable for contemporary clinical practice.

Using the point-count method for tumor extent, our study questions a real existence for pathologic stage pT2b tumors (unilateral tumors involving greater than one-half of one lobe).

Purpose: To analyze controversial clinicopathologic predictors of biochemical recurrence after surgery: age, race, tumor extent on surgical specimen, tumor extent on needle biopsy, Gleason score 3 + 4 vs 4 + 3, and amount of extent of extraprostatic extension and positive surgical margins. Materials and Methods:The needle biopsies and the correspondent surgical specimens were analyzed from 400 patients. Time to recurrence was analyzed with the Kaplan--Meier curves and risk of shorter time to recurrence using Cox univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Except for age, race, maximum percentage of cancer per core, and number of cores with cancer, all other variables studied were significantly predictive of time to biochemical recurrence using the Kaplan-Meier curves. In univariate analysis, except for focal extraprostatic extension, age, race, focal positive surgical margins, and maximum extent and percentage of cancer per core, all other variables were significantly predictive of shorter time to recurrence. On multivariate analysis, diffuse positive surgical margins and preoperative PSA were independent predictors. Conclusions: Young patients and non-whites were not significantly associated with time to biochemical recurrence. The time consuming tumor extent evaluation in surgical specimens seems not to add additional information to other well established predictive findings. The higher predictive value of Gleason score 4 + 3 = 7 vs 3 + 4 = 7 discloses the importance of grade 4 as the predominant pattern. Extent and not simply presence or absent of extraprostatic extension should be informed. Most tumor extent evaluations on needle biopsies are predictive of time to biochemical recurrence, however, maximum

CONTEXT: The presence of multiple neoplasms in one patient is an uncommon event. Its occurrence ranges from 1.2% to 4.5% of cancer patients in autopsy and clinical studies. In the present article, cases of synchronous diagnoses of carcinoma and lymphoid neoplasms are reported. The intention of this report was to alert clinicians and pathologists to the possibility of the existence of concomitant neoplasms, in order to prevent inaccurate or delayed diagnosis and staging. CASES:Seven patients (four female and three male) with a median age of 61.4 years were diagnosed as having concomitant epithelial and hematological neoplasms. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Lymph nodes should be carefully examined when searching for metastases, because of the possibility of a second hematological malignancy. Whenever uncommon suspicious morphological features are seen in such neoplasms, an immunohistochemical analysis is essential.

Objective The aim of active surveillance of early prostate cancer is to individualize therapy by selecting for curative treatment only patients with significant cancer. Epstein’s criteria for prediction of clinically insignificant cancer in surgical specimens are widely used. Epstein’s criterion “no single core with >50% cancer” has no correspondence in linear extent. The aim of this study is to find a possible correspondence.Materials and Methods From a total of 401 consecutive patients submitted to radical prostatectomy, 17 (4.2%) met criteria for insignificant cancer in the surgical specimen. The clinicopathologic findings in the correspondent biopsies were compared with Epstein’s criteria for insignificant cancer. Cancer in a single core was evaluated in percentage as well as linear extent in mm.Results Comparing the clinicopathologic findings with Epstein’s criteria predictive of insignificant cancer, there was 100% concordance for clinical stage T1c, no Gleason pattern 4 or 5, ≤2 cores with cancer, and no single core with >50% cancer. However, only 25% had density ≤0.15. The mean, median and range of the maximum length of cancer in a single core in mm were 1.19, 1, and 0.5-2.5, respectively. Additionally, the mean, median, and range of length of cancer in all cores in mm were 1.47, 1.5, and 0.5-3, respectively.Conclusion To pathologists that use Epstein’s criteria predictive of insignificant cancer and measure linear extent in mm, our study favors that “no single core with >50% cancer” may correspond to >2.5 mm in linear extent.