No abstract

In order to determine the impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the management of spinal cord retethering, we retrospectively reviewed case and imaging records of 51 patients who underwent MRI examination in supine and prone positions. Group 1 included 8 control patients without cord tethering. They exhibited a normal level of the conus medullaris with normal surrounding subarachnoid space, and consistent anterior migration of the conus within the dural sac on MRI in prone position. Group 2 included 17 patients with tethered cord secondary to occult spinal dysraphism (spinal cord lipoma in 6 patients, thick filum terminale in 4, diastematomyelia in 4, myelomeningocele manque in 2, and dermoid tumour in 1). Supine and prone MRI performed at a median period of time of 6 months after untethering showed resolution of posterior tethering in 5 out of the 7 patients who exhibited pre-opera-tively dorsal attachment of the spinal cord to the dura. Anterior migration of the conus or of the cord/filum complex in prone position was observed in only 24% of the cases. Group 3 included 26 patients with secondary tethered cord following prior myelomeningocele closure. Their MRI performed at a median interval of time of 11 months following untethering demonstrated resolution of the posterior cord tethering in only 8 out of the 24 patients who exhibited this feature pre-operatively. Anterior migration within the expanded dural sac was never noted in this group. We conclude that spine MRI is of limited value and that prone-positioned MRI is of no additional use in the evaluation of spinal cord retethering.

A large proportion of the cohort (93.8%) develops acquired microcephaly after an inflicted head injury and cerebral atrophy is responsible in half of these cases.

Making the diagnosis of non‐accidental head injury, particularly in the acute illness, can be difficult. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the acute presentation of non‐accidental head injury. Twelve cases admitted to the Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh with a diagnosis of non‐accidental head injury, and who had magnetic resonance imaging in the acute illness, were identified. The average age was 5.7 mo (range 1 to 34 mo). The mechanism of the primary injury was whiplash‐shaking injury syndrome with impact in four cases and without evidence of impact in seven; in one case there was a compression injury. The magnetic resonance imaging findings reflected the pathological consequences of rotational acceleration‐deceleration injury and did not differ between those cases with evidence of impact and those without. Subdural haematomas were identified in all cases; the commonest location for subdural blood was the subtemporal region. It is surprising and important that the most frequent location of subdural blood was in the subtemporal area. This is an area difficult to assess by computerized tomography. Evidence of repeated injuries was found in two cases. These findings confirm the value of magnetic resonance imaging in the acute phase of non‐accidental head injury. □Child abuse, magnetic resonance imaging, non‐accidental head injury, whiplash shaking injury

No abstract