1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1999.tb00034.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging in acute non‐accidental head injury

Abstract: Making the diagnosis of non‐accidental head injury, particularly in the acute illness, can be difficult. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the acute presentation of non‐accidental head injury. Twelve cases admitted to the Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh with a diagnosis of non‐accidental head injury, and who had magnetic resonance imaging in the acute illness, were identified. The average age was 5.7 mo (range 1 to 34 mo). The mechanism of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high water content of the neonatal brain makes it difficult to handle during autopsy, even when adequately fixed. Subdural hemorrhage is the commonest type of injury found and this is in keeping with pathologic evidence and CT studies (9). It is caused by damage to the bridging veins which drain from the cortex into the superficial venous sinuses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The high water content of the neonatal brain makes it difficult to handle during autopsy, even when adequately fixed. Subdural hemorrhage is the commonest type of injury found and this is in keeping with pathologic evidence and CT studies (9). It is caused by damage to the bridging veins which drain from the cortex into the superficial venous sinuses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The interhemispheric fissure was the next commonest site, followed by the posterior and middle cranial fossa. This is similar to the findings of Sato and colleagues, 14 but differs from the observations of Barlow and colleagues, 13 who cite the subtemporal region as the commonest site of SDH in NAHI. Interhemispheric blood was most often seen following NAHI; indeed, apart from NAHI, SDH in the interhemispheric fissures, and posterior and middle cranial fossa was only otherwise seen following severe accidental trauma (cases of road traffic accident) and coagulopathy.…”
contrasting
confidence: 43%
“…The diagnosis of SDH is made by cranial imaging, mainly computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); the features of SDH due to non-accidental head injury (NAHI) are well described. [8][9][10][11] MRI is used as an adjunct to CT in the radiological assessment of SDH to detect subdural blood in areas not well seen on CT, [12][13][14] or small volume SDHs, to differentiate subdural and subarachnoid blood and to show parenchymal injuries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,[7][8][9][10][11] There was no significant difference in mean age, gender ratio, frequency of mortality, main symptoms at presentation (vomiting, loss of consciousness, cardiopulmonary arrest, etc), ecchymoses, fractures, or retinal hemorrhages between the group with full confessions (n ϭ 29) and the group without full confessions (n ϭ 83) ( Table 1). Because of the retrospective and unique character of the study, no power calculations were performed before beginning the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%