Amisulpride binds selectively to dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors in the limbic system. Low doses of amisulpride preferentially block presynaptic D(2)/D(3)-dopamine autoreceptors, thereby enhancing dopaminergic transmission, whereas higher doses block postsynaptic receptors, thus inhibiting dopaminergic hyperactivity. Amisulpride is clinically effective on the negative symptoms of acute schizophrenia exacerbations at low dosages (50-300 mg/day), and also on the positive symptoms of the disease at high dosages (400-800 mg/day). Nineteen clinical studies involving 358 volunteers have investigated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of amisulpride. Amisulpride shows linear pharmacokinetics, a bioavailability of 48%, low protein binding (17%) and an elimination half-life of approximately 12 h. It is predominantly eliminated in the urine as the parent compound. It exhibits no significant detrimental effects in psychometric or memory tests up to the dose of 400 mg/day, inducing only mild impairment at high doses, whereas EEG data suggest an alertness-enhancing effect at low doses (
Amisulpride, a substituted benzamide with high affinity for dopamine D2 and D3 receptors only, has been reported to have therapeutic effects on both negative and positive schizophrenic symptoms, although at distinct dose ranges (50-300 mg/day vs. 400-1,200 mg/day). The purpose of this study was to investigate the binding of amisulpride to extrastriatal (i.e., thalamus and temporal cortex) and striatal D2 dopamine receptors with respect to plasma amisulpride determinations. Ten patients with schizophrenia treated with amisulpride over a wide range of doses (25-1,200 mg/day) were studied. Positron emission tomography images were acquired by using 76Br-FLB-457, a highly specific antagonist of the D2 and D3 dopamine receptors. Binding indexes (BI) in the regions studied were estimated with reference to values from six healthy subjects. A curvilinear relationship was demonstrated between plasma concentration of amisulpride and the BI in extrastriatal regions. The BI also varied as a function of plasma concentration in striatum. Furthermore, the data provide evidence for different binding profiles: low plasma concentrations (28-92 ng/mL) induced marked extrastriatal binding and low striatal binding, whereas higher plasma concentrations (>153 ng/mL) induced marked binding both in extrastriatal and striatal regions. Dose-dependent differential binding profiles of amisulpride to D2 receptors in extrastriatal and striatal regions were demonstrated, and two therapeutic ranges of plasma concentrations for negative and positive schizophrenic symptoms, respectively, are suggested.
In this double-blind, placebo controlled, four-way cross-over trial in 16 healthy elderly volunteers, the acute effects of haloperidol 2 mg, amisulpride 50 mg and 200 mg, were assessed on a range of tests of cognitive function. On each study day, cognitive performance was assessed prior to dosing and at 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 24 h after dosing with the following tests from the Cognitive Drug Research computerized assessment system: simple reaction time, digit vigilance task, choice reaction time, visual tracking, Critical Flicker Fusion, body sway, numeric working memory, immediate and delayed word recall, word recognition and self-ratings of mood and alertness. Haloperidol showed a general tendency to impair performance, and although this did not reach significance compared to placebo, for two tasks there were significant impairments with haloperidol compared to amisulpride. Amisulpride 50 mg and 200 mg, was not associated with impairment. In fact, there was some suggestion of improvement over placebo on three measures. The timings of assessment were appropriate for the study compounds. Furthermore, in a recent study in which a smaller number of elderly volunteers was tested on the same cognitive assessment system, a clear profile of acute impairments of haloperidol 3 mg, was identified. This indicates that haloperidol 2 mg, is not a sufficient dose to affect cognitive function in the elderly, supporting the general absence of effects with this dose in the young. Thus, the general absence of cognitive impairments with amisulpride at the doses used in this study suggests that this compound does not impair cognitive function in the elderly.
A single oral dose of amisulpride was well tolerated and showed a similar pharmacokinetic profile in healthy elderly and young subjects. However, these findings should be confirmed after multiple dosing in a larger population in order to establish the lack of need of dosage adjustment in this elderly population.
The kinetics of cibenzoline (UP 339.01), a new antiarrhythmic drug, was studied after i.v. and oral administration to 5 healthy subjects. Cibenzoline levels in plasma and urine cibenzoline were measured by a GLC method. After i.v. administration, the total clearance was 826 ml . min-1. The fraction of cibenzoline excreted unchanged in the urine was 0.602 and it was correlated with the creatinine clearance. After i.v. and oral administration, the renal clearances were 499 ml . min-1 and 439 ml . min-1, and the half-lives were 4 h 01 min and 3 h 24 min, respectively. The differences were not significant. Availability by the oral route was 0.92, the maximum plasma concentration being observed at 1 h 36 min. The results were compared with those for other antiarrhythmic drugs.
S U M M A R YAim : To evaluate the effects of various doses of lintopride, a new 5HT-4 antagonist with moderate 5HT-3 antagonist properties, on oesophageal body and lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) motility in humans. Methods: Eight healthy male volunteers, mean age 22 (1 9-2 8) years, without any history of digestive disease or chest pain, were randomized to three doses of lintopride (0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 mg/kg i.v.) and a placebo at 1-week intervals in a double-blind, crossover study. Oesophageal motility was recorded continuously for 4 h after each dose, using perfused catheters inserted at the level of the LOS and in the body of the oesophagus, at 5, 10 and 1 5 cm from the LOS. Peristalsis was studied during 10 wet swallows, at 30-min intervals (&-q4, min). Results: The LOS basal pressure (2 3.3 _+ 2 .O cmH,O ; mean k s.d.) remained stable after dosing with placebo to TA4,. After lintopride, LOS basal pressure increased significantly vs. placebo (AUC comparison : 0.1 mg/kg, P = 0.036; 0.3 mg/kg, P = 0.027; 0.5 mg/kg, P = 0.052). In contrast, the duration and extent of LOS relaxation after swallowing was not affected by any of the three doses of lintopride. The amplitude of peristaltic waves in the oesophagus increased significantly at I j , after lintopride 0.3 mg/kg (34.5 cmH,O, P = 0.020) and 0.5 mg/kg (32.5 cmH,O, P = 0.027), at Go after 0.3 mg/kg (48.8 cmH,O, P = 0.0009) and 0.5 mg.kg (29.1 cmH,O, P = 0.029) and at T,, after 0.3 mg/kg (34.5 cmH,O, P = 0.0018). Conclusions : Lintopride significantly increased the LOS basal tone without affecting LOS physiological relaxation after swallowing. PeristaItic waves were also enhanced by lintopride. 0 19Y 5 Blackwell Science Ltd 563
Lithium may be used as adjuvant therapy in schizophrenic patients and antipsychotics can be employed during the early phases of lithium therapy in patients with bipolar disorder. The issue of interactions between lithium and antipsychotics is therefore important. This study investigates the potential influence of repeated administration of amisulpride, an atypical antipsychotic, on the pharmacokinetics of lithium at steady state. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers (aged 1833 yr) received lithium carbonate (500 mg b.i.d.) for 14 d. All subjects were shown to have stable lithium serum concentrations after 57 d and were then randomized to receive double-blind administration of amisulpride (100 mg b.i.d.) or placebo bid from day 8 of lithium administration. Complete pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained on days 7 and 14 for lithium and trough plasma concentrations on days 10, 12 and 14 for amisulpride. Co-administration of amisulpride appeared to exert no effect on the pharmacokinetics of lithium. All treatments were well tolerated and safety assessment revealed no differences between the lithium+placebo and lithium+amisulpride groups. This finding permits the flexible use of amisulpride in patients already receiving lithium therapy.
"Rave parties", all-night dance parties based on "techno" music, represent an increasing phenomenon in France. "Rave drugs" refers to a wide variety of drugs used by the young participants owing to their hallucinogenic or stimulant effects. Uncertainties about the sources of these substances, the possible contaminants and the multiplicity of the associations make it difficult to evaluate the toxic consequences that might be expected in this particular context. This report presents toxicological cases documented by analytical findings in which two pharmacological agents abused in "rave parties" in South-West of France were found. The day following a party, a 17 year-old girl showed a confused state with drowsiness and hallucinations. She confessed having consumed a white powder sold as "ecstasy", that sample analysis identified as pure ketamine. Ketamine is an anaesthetic agent primarily used in veterinary medicine and paediatrics. This drug seems to be abused, mainly by the intranasal route, owing to its hallucinogen effects. Its used in "rave-party" appears to be marked by unsuspected consumption. All long another party, a large quantity of orange tablets were sold and abused by several participants. Analysis performed on some fragments of these tablets revealed the presence of prolintane and ascorbic acid. Prolintane, an amphetamine-related substance, is a central nervous system stimulant. This compound is "freely" available in Spain in combination with several vitamins, under the form of tablets with orange coating named "Katovit" and sold at low price: 1.93 €/20 tablets (200 mg of prolintane).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.