Resumen El objetivo de este trabajo es explorar los sentimientos y expectativas que genera el COVID-19 en Argentina durante la primera etapa de la pandemia. Se aplicó una encuesta de la Organización Mundial de la Salud adaptada al contexto local. Se incluyeron preguntas abiertas para indagar sentimientos de las personas frente al COVID-19, y se realizó un análisis de contenido. Como resultados se advierte que la población encuestada siente incertidumbre, miedo y angustia, pero también emerge un sentimiento de responsabilidad y cuidado frente al COVID-19. Así mismo se destacan sentimientos positivos para la sociedad como una valoración de la interdependencia social. Los resultados arribados señalan que el impacto en la salud mental es desigual según el género, el nivel educativo alcanzado y el confort percibido en el hogar. El estudio permite concluir que las dimensiones emocionales y vinculares de las personas resultan aspectos centrales ante la pandemia del COVID-19 en Argentina. Es recomendable que estas dimensiones, así como y su impacto subjetivo y social diferencial entre los diversos grupos poblacionales, sean consideradas en la planificación de políticas para afrontar el COVID-19.

Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to selfarchive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com".

There may be gender inequalities in primary care for COPD in our setting. Diagnostic and therapeutic efforts appear lower in female patients. Male and female FPs only differed in care of the male patient, indicating FP gender-patient gender interaction.

BackgroundThere is a growing interest in identifying strategies to achieve safer primary health‐care provision. However, most of the research conducted so far in this area relies on information supplied by health‐care providers, and limited attention has been paid to patients’ perspectives.ObjectiveTo explore patients’ experiences and perceptions of patient safety in English general practices with the aim of eliciting patient‐centred recommendations for improving patient safety.MethodsThe Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 6736 primary care users registered in 45 English practices. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of responses to seven open‐ended items addressing patients’ experiences of safety problems, lessons learnt as a result of such experiences and recommendations for safer health care.ResultsA total of 1244 (18.4%) participants returned completed questionnaires. Of those, 678 (54.5%) responded to at least one open‐ended question. Two main themes emerged as follows: (i) experiences of safety problems and (ii) good practices and recommendations to improve patient safety in primary care. Most frequent experiences of safety problems were related to appointments, coordination between providers, tests, medication and diagnosis. Patients’ responses to these problems included increased patient activation (eg speaking up about concerns with their health care) and avoidance of unnecessary health care. Recommendations for safer health care included improvements in patient‐centred communication, continuity of care, timely appointments, technical quality of care, active monitoring, teamwork, health records and practice environment.ConclusionThis study identified a number of patient‐centred recommendations for improving patient safety in English general practices.

Purpose: This systematic review aimed to reconceptualise experiences from a variety of papers to provide direction for research, policy and practice.Method: Meta-ethnography was used to inform the review and 21 studies were included.Findings: The analysis identified a core theme of 'engaging in care: struggling through', as carers who wanted to be involved in caring learnt to live with the intense and stressful impact of caring and changes to their life. The core theme is represented through three themes 1) Helping another to live 2) Adapting ways of living and 3) Negotiating the unknown.Conclusions: The discussion identified a focus on carers of people suffering from a hip fracture, the willingness of informal carers to engage in caring and the intense experience of adapting to changes in relationships and dependency alongside a steep experiential learning curve. Tensions exist in negotiations with complex healthcare systems as carers do not feel their expertise is valued and struggle to find and understand information.

No abstract

No abstract

Resumen: La violencia de género es una violación a los derechos humanos y un grave problema de salud pública que debe ser abordado de forma intersectorial y con un enfoque interdisciplinario. La colaboración y coordinación entre los sectores, incluido salud, es fundamental para garantizar el correcto abordaje. Los objetivos de este trabajo son: conocer qué agentes abordan la violencia de género en las comunidades, y estudiar las opiniones de las comunidades en relación al rol y al abordaje del sistema público de salud ante esta problemática. Se realizó una investigación-acción cualitativa con talleres de autodiagnóstico comunitario local, utilizando diversas técnicas cualitativas. Análisis temático. Los resultados indican que existen diversos actores locales que abordan la problemática y que la atención primaria de la salud cumple un rol relevante, principalmente debido a sus características de cercanía con la población y abordaje interdisciplinario. Los obstáculos identificados por las comunidades para el abordaje desde el sistema de salud se vinculan principalmente con el modelo biomédico de atención, la descentralización y la falta de recursos, de capacitación y de políticas integradas. En conclusión, los talleres facilitaron la construcción de un conocimiento colectivo respecto a la realidad local, donde se destaca el rol de la atención primaria de la salud y la necesidad de articular acciones y abordajes entre sectores y localidades.