The suprachoroidal space (SCS), a potential space between the sclera and choroid, is becoming an applicable method to deliver therapeutics to the back of the eye. In recent years, a vast amount of research in the field has been carried out, with new discoveries in different areas of interest, such as imaging, drug delivery methods, pharmacokinetics, pharmacotherapies in preclinical and clinical trials and advanced therapies. The SCS can be visualized via advanced techniques of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in eyes with different pathologies, and even in healthy eyes. Drugs can be delivered easily and safely via hollow microneedles fitted to the length of the approximate thickness of the sclera. SCS injections were found to reach greater baseline concentrations in the target layers compared to intravitreal (IVT) injection, while agent clearance was faster with highly aqueous soluble molecules. Clinical trials with SCS injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) were executed with promising findings for patients with noninfectious uveitis (NIU), NIU implicated with macular edema and diabetic macular edema (DME). Gene therapy is evolving rapidly with viral and non-viral vectors that were found to be safe and efficient in preclinical trials. Here, we review these novel different aspects and new developments in clinical treatment of the posterior segment of the eye.

No abstract

Background The goal of this study is to compare ophthalmic emergency room (OER) visits during the Coronavirus disease-19 (Covid-19) pandemic to those during a control period. Methods We compared all visits to the OER to Meir Medical Center in Israel, from March 15th to April 15th, 2020, during the Covid-19 pandemic and government mandated quarantine, to the same period in 2019. Factors analyzed were patient demographics, chief complaints, referral patterns, exam findings, treatments given, hospitalizations and surgical interventions. Results We included in this study 1311 visits of 1158 patients, 477 during the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic and 834 during the same period in 2019. The demographic distribution (age, gender, and ethnicity) was similar between the two periods. LogMAR visual acuity at presentation was worse during the Covid-19 pandemic (0.42 ± 0.6 and 0.34 ± 0.5 in 2020 and 2019 respectively; p = 0.025) and the number of emergent surgeries was higher (3.7% in 2020 vs 1.8% in 2019, p = 0.026). In 2019 there was a higher likelihood of involvement of both segments of the eye (4.82% versus 1.2%, p < 0.01) and more diagnoses were given to each patient (1 ± 0.5 versus 0.93 ± 0.35, p = 0.001; During the Covid − 19 pandemic medications (both topical and systemic) were prescribed more often (1.22 ± 0.95 in 2020 and 0.84 ± 0.67 in 2019, p < 0.001). Conclusions OER visits were less frequent during the Covid − 19 pandemic as compared to 2019, though the demographics of the patients remained unchanged. Visits during the pandemic tended to be for more severe ocular conditions, with worse visual acuity at presentation and required more medical and surgical treatment which imply higher necessity of ocular evaluation. This analysis can aid healthcare resource management in similar scenarios in the future.

No abstract

Introduction Timing of retinal detachment (RD) following cataract surgery is of importance for both diagnostic and prognostic factors. However, results on RD onset-time following cataract surgery have been conflicting. Method A systematic pooled analysis of the literature regarding timing of retinal detachment following cataract surgery. Outcomes were verified against an independent dataset. Results Twenty-one studies, reporting on rates of RD in 3,352,094 eyes of 2,458,561 patients, met our inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The mean pooled time to RD following surgery was 23.12 months (95% CI: 17.79–28.45 months) with high heterogeneity between studies (I 2=100%, P < 0.00001). Meta-analytic pooling for the risk of retinal detachment revealed a risk of 1.167% (95% CI: 0.900 to 1.468, I 2=99.50%, P < 0.0001). A retrospective chart review identified 54 pseudophakic RD cases (mean age 65.5, 59.3% males). The 95% confidence interval for the mean time to RD was 3.1–6.75 years. Conclusions The interval between cataract surgery and RD in a pooled analysis revealed a mean time of approximately 1.5–2.3 years. However, there was high variability between studies. Validation based on our local results showed similar yet slightly longer time frames. Timing of pseudophakic retinal detachment might direct appropriate follow-up, assisting in earlier detection.

Background Optic neuritis (ON) is the most common cause of acute unilateral visual loss in young adults and frequently occurs as the presenting symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS). Recently, we reported activation of peripheral blood CD19 + B-cells in the early stage of ON. In the current study we aimed to identify peripheral blood B-cell molecular markers associated with ON severity and visual outcome. Methods Expression of B-cell related biomarkers were analysed in patients with the first clinical presentation of acute unilateral ON. Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR). visual acuity, Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) visual score and visual evoked responses were evaluated at onset and visual acuity and EDSS visual score were repeated at 6 months post-ON. Results Thirty patients with acute unilateral ON, 77% female, mean age 33 ± 2.0 years, were enroled in the study. Expression of CD19, CD79A and CD20 B-cell markers significantly correlated with LogMAR visual acuity of the affected eye (r = 0.44, p = 0.01, r = 0.37, p = 0.01 and r = 0.36, p = 0.04, respectively). The marker levels were elevated between 1.5 and 2.2-folds in the group with worse visual acuity (LogMAR>1.0) at onset (CD79A:×1.5, p = 0.013; CD19:×2.25, p = 0.007; CD20:×1.5, p = 0.015) and not correlated with 6 month visual outcome. Conclusions Among patient with a first event of acute ON, expression of B-cell biomarkers correlated with the severity of the disease. These results could add information on the role of B-cell dysfunction in the early stages of ON.

Purpose: To identify risk factors for incorrect self-identification of the treatment eye before intravitreal injections. Methods: This prospective study included consecutive patients who were asked to designate the eye for which the intravitreal injection was intended and were subsequently divided into two groups according to whether or not they identified the correct eye. Results: Overall, 349 eyes (n = 349) were included, and 8.6% (n = 30) designated the incorrect eye or did not know which eye was intended for treatment. Incorrect designation was associated with diabetic macular edema (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33 [0.15–0.75]), first injection in the intended eye or ≥1 year since previous injection (OR = 0.34 [0.14–0.87]), Arabic native tongue (OR = 0.48 [0.22–1.01]), previous injection to the fellow eye (OR = 0.26 [0.10–0.64]), and concurrent treatment of both eyes (OR = 0.35 [0.16–0.74]). Multivariate analysis showed the first injection or ≥1 year since last injection in the treatment eye (R2 = 2.24%, P = 0.004, OR = 0.20 [0.07–0.57]) and previous injection in the fellow eye (R2 = 6.55%, P < 0.001, OR = 0.20 [0.07–0.52]) as significant independent predictors of incorrect identification. Conclusion: Several factors are associated with a greater probability for incorrect patient's self-identification of the eye laterality intended for intravitreal injections. These findings may help identify patients with a higher risk of such potential errors.

No abstract