2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04396-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractive surgery in the late adulthood and adolescent age groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adolescents show relatively more favorable outcomes with slightly better safety and efficacy indices and lower retreatment rates, than adults. 20 From previous studies, superior results…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adolescents show relatively more favorable outcomes with slightly better safety and efficacy indices and lower retreatment rates, than adults. 20 From previous studies, superior results…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There have been a few trials that compared results between adolescents and adults using different laser machines and nomograms. 19,20 Compared to the Streamlight, two-step TransPRK using EX500 required no additional cost to perform the procedure. To prevent under-correction from the PTK mode, the surgeon should add PRK laser to over-correct between −0.25 and −0.50 diopters to subtract that myopic shift.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Moreover, limited but available long term data of myopic LASIK in pediatric population (⩽16 years) can't be extrapolated as well to the late adolescent population considered here (⩾17 and <20 years), as the risk for intraoperative complications (such as decentrations and subsequently aberrated corneas due to lack of fixation) and myopia progression (higher as lower the age at the time of surgery) is different. [2][3][4][5] This points out the relevance of studying closely and reporting properly the long term outcomes of these late adolescent patients candidates for refractive surgery that, although they are not the usual reality of any refractive center, any refractive surgeon face these type of patients with relative frequency. Hecht et al 5 reported the short term outcomes (mean follow-up of 7.1 months) of 607 myopic adolescents (mean age of 16.9 years), demonstrating equivalent refractive and visual outcomes compared with young adults (20-40 years), observing even significant better values of postoperative UDVA in the adolescent population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5] This points out the relevance of studying closely and reporting properly the long term outcomes of these late adolescent patients candidates for refractive surgery that, although they are not the usual reality of any refractive center, any refractive surgeon face these type of patients with relative frequency. Hecht et al 5 reported the short term outcomes (mean follow-up of 7.1 months) of 607 myopic adolescents (mean age of 16.9 years), demonstrating equivalent refractive and visual outcomes compared with young adults (20-40 years), observing even significant better values of postoperative UDVA in the adolescent population. However, this study mixed myopic PRK and LASIK cases (95% vs 5%, respectively), and did not report long term data, including patients with a minimum follow-up time of only 1 month for LASIK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation