In the frame of global demand for electrical storage based on lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), their recycling with a focus on the circular economy is a critical topic. In terms of political incentives, the European legislative is currently under revision. Most industrial recycling processes target valuable battery components, such as nickel and cobalt, but do not focus on lithium recovery. Especially in the context of reduced cobalt shares in the battery cathodes, it is important to investigate environmentally friendly and economic and robust recycling processes to ensure lithium mobilization. In this study, the method early-stage lithium recovery (“ESLR”) is studied in detail. Its concept comprises the shifting of lithium recovery to the beginning of the chemo-metallurgical part of the recycling process chain in comparison to the state-of-the-art. In detail, full NCM (Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide)-based electric vehicle cells are thermally treated to recover heat-treated black mass. Then, the heat-treated black mass is subjected to an H2O-leaching step to examine the share of water-soluble lithium phases. This is compared to a carbonation treatment with supercritical CO2, where a higher extent of lithium from the heat-treated black mass can be transferred to an aqueous solution than just by H2O-leaching. Key influencing factors on the lithium yield are the filter cake purification, the lithium separation method, the solid/liquid ratio, the pyrolysis temperature and atmosphere, and the setup of autoclave carbonation, which can be performed in an H2O-environment or in a dry autoclave environment. The carbonation treatments in this study are reached by an autoclave reactor working with CO2 in a supercritical state. This enables selective leaching of lithium in H2O followed by a subsequent thermally induced precipitation as lithium carbonate. In this approach, treatment with supercritical CO2 in an autoclave reactor leads to lithium yields of up to 79%.

High-energy battery systems are gaining attention in the frame of global demands for electronic devices and vehicle electrification. This context leads to higher demands in terms of battery system properties, such as cycle stability and energy density. Here, Lithium–Sulfur (Li–S) batteries comprise an alternative to conventional Li-Ion battery (LIB) systems and can be asserted to next-generation electric storage systems. They offer a promising solution for contemporary needs, especially for applications requiring a higher energy density. In a global environment with increasing sustainable economics and ambitions towards commodity recirculation, the establishing of new technologies should also be evaluated in terms of their recycling potential. In this sense, innovative recycling considers highly valuable metals but also mobilizes all technologically relevant materials for reaching a high Recycling Efficiency (RE). This study uses an approach in which the recycling of Li–S batteries is addressed. For this purpose, a holistic recycling process using both thermal and hydrometallurgical steps is suggested for a safe treatment in combination with a maximum possible recycling efficiency. According to the batteries’ chemical composition, the containing elements are recovered separately, while a multi-step treatment is chosen. Hence, a thermal treatment in combination with a subsequent mechanical comminution separates a black mass powder containing all recoverable resources from the metal casing. The black mass is then treated further in an aqueous solution using different solid/liquid ratios: 1:20, 1:50, 1:55, and 1:100. Different basic and acidic leaching solutions are compared with one another: sulfuric acid (H2SO4), nitric acid (HNO3), hydrochloric acid (HCl), and NaOH. For further precipitation steps, different additives for a pH adjustment are also contrasted: sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and potassium hydroxide (KOH). The results are evaluated by both purity and yield; chemical analysis is performed by ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry). The aim of this recycling process comprises a maximum yield for the main Li–S battery fractions: Li, S, C, and Al. The focal point for the evaluation comprises lithium yields, and up to 93% of lithium could be transferred to a solid lithium carbonate product.

In the coming years, the demand for safe electrical energy storage devices with high energy density will increase drastically due to the electrification of the transportation sector and the need for stationary storage for renewable energies. Advanced battery concepts like all-solid-state batteries (ASBs) are considered one of the most promising candidates for future energy storage technologies. They offer several advantages over conventional Lithium-Ion Batteries (LIBs), especially with regard to stability, safety, and energy density. Hardly any recycling studies have been conducted, yet, but such examinations will play an important role when considering raw materials supply, sustainability of battery systems, CO2 footprint, and general strive towards a circular economy. Although different methods for recycling LIBs are already available, the transferability to ASBs is not straightforward due to differences in used materials and fabrication technologies, even if the chemistry does not change (e.g., Li-intercalation cathodes). Challenges in terms of the ceramic nature of the cell components and thus the necessity for specific recycling strategies are investigated here for the first time. As a major result, a recycling route based on inert shredding, a subsequent thermal treatment, and a sorting step is suggested, and transferring the extracted black mass to a dedicated hydrometallurgical recycling process is proposed. The hydrometallurgical approach is split into two scenarios differing in terms of solubility of the ASB-battery components. Hence, developing a full recycling concept is reached by this study, which will be experimentally examined in future research.

It is a common understanding worldwide that electromobility will have a significant share in passenger transport and that there will be a very dynamic increase in the return volumes of discarded batteries in the future [...]

No abstract