The identification of brightness enhacement during CEUS in carotid atherosclerotic plaques may not always reflect the presence of VV.

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: Are there differences in outcomes in uniport compared with multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery? Altogether, 45 papers were found using the reported search, of which 8 papers represent the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type and level of evidence of publication, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Two studies (272 patients) compared outcomes for lobectomy. One study found pain control was significantly better in uniportal (P < 0.01) with earlier mobilization (P < 0.05), and decreased hospital stay by half a day (P < 0.05). The chest drain volume was less, and consequently the number of days the chest drain remained in situ decreased by 1 day (P < 0.05). The second study looking at lobectomies failed to find any differences between the two techniques. For minor thoracic procedures (pneumothorax, peripheral lung nodules, thymic tumours, lung biopsies, sympathectomies and mediastinal cystectomies), 3 papers (117 patients) showed a statistically significant reduction in pain score during inpatient stay, and 1 paper showed a reduction in pain score day 0 postoperatively, however, no difference in pain score days 1 and 3 postoperatively. Two papers (n = 91) showed no difference in the reported pain scores; however, the patients in the uniportal group experienced less paraesthesia postoperatively. Patients in the uniportal group in this study also had reduced in-hospital stay (P = 0.03), and this led to a reduction in inpatient costs (P = 0.03). Four other studies, however, did not find any significant difference in duration of hospital stay. Pain scores are lower in uniportal VATS, most studies however do not demonstrate differences in other outcomes including analgesic use, duration of chest tube drainage, length of hospital stay or other thoracic complications. We conclude that, although uniport access may offer improved pain scores, the current evidence reveals no differences in most postoperative outcomes between uniport and multiport approaches to VATS in either minor or major thoracic procedures.

A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether the extent of pulmonary resection affects survival in patients with synchronous multiple primary lung cancers undergoing curative surgery. A total of 724 papers were identified using the reported searches, of which 14 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, date, journal, country, study type, population, outcomes and key results are tabulated. All studies were retrospective. Eight of 14 studies found no difference in terms of median, overall or progression-free survival when a sublobar resection in the form of a wedge resection or segmentectomy was performed for at least one of the synchronous lesions. Two studies demonstrated a negative impact on survival when lobectomy or bilobectomy was not performed for each lesion. Five papers reviewed the role of pneumonectomy in this category of patients and four of them demonstrated that such an extended resection has a significantly negative impact on survival, while, in one study, although pneumonectomy when compared with sublobar resections and photodynamic therapy had decreased long-term survival, this difference did not reach statistical significance. The use of lung-sparing resections (wedge resection or segmentectomy) of at least one lesion (if technically feasible) is advised for patients with synchronous multiple primary lung cancers. Most studies do not demonstrate any differences in immediate or long-term survival with two anatomical resections. Embarking for anatomical lung resections in the form of lobectomies should be done only in those cases where there are no concerns about postoperative pulmonary reserve. The performance of a pneumonectomy should be avoided, especially for bilateral synchronous lesions, unless it is absolutely necessary.

A 75-year-old man previously underwent pneumonectomy for lung cancer. He subsequently had colorectal adenocarcinoma, and resection of metastases from his remaining lung was performed. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used for perioperative respiratory support to facilitate intraoperative deflation of the remaining lung and optimization of the surgical field. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was continued postoperatively, allowing immediate extubation, thus avoiding strain on suture lines. Advantages, and potential risks, of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for thoracic surgery are discussed.

A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether pulmonary resection is safe and worthwhile in patients who have undergone previous pneumonectomy. A total of 141 studies were identified using the reported search, of which 8 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. Studies on multiple lung cancers with patients undergoing subsequent pulmonary resection after previous pneumonectomy, without outcome data specifically for this group of patients and case reports, were not included in this analysis. The authors, date, journal, country, study type, population, outcomes and key results are tabulated. All studies were retrospective. In total, 102 patients underwent pulmonary resection after contralateral pneumonectomy, of which 96 had sublobar resections and 6 had lobectomies. Postoperative complications, reported in four of the eight studies, ranged from 21 to 44% (mean from four studies 36.8%). Four of the eight studies reported no mortality after pulmonary resection following pneumonectomy, whereas the other four reported mortality rates from 6.7 to 43%. For patients undergoing sublobar resections, the postoperative mortality was 6.2% (6/96), while for those submitted to lobectomy, mortality was 33.3% (2/6). Five-year survival rates ranged from 14% for metastatic disease to 50% for metachronous lung cancer. Due to the infrequent situation of a patient being considered for a pulmonary resection after contralateral pneumonectomy, this analysis was based on a limited number of patients from eight reports. Nevertheless, analysis of the data suggests that pulmonary resection for metastatic or metachronous disease can be performed with acceptable morbidity and low mortality in appropriately selected patients who have previously undergone a pneumonectomy. Sublobar resection is the treatment of choice whenever possible, for which long-term results are rewarding especially for patients with metachronous lung cancer.

Lymphovascular invasion is associated with a worse overall survival in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer regardless of tumor stage. Parietal pleural involvement, N2 nodal disease, and advanced age independently predict poor overall survival.

IntroductionPrimary splenic angiosarcoma is a rare neoplasm of vascular origin carrying a very poor prognosis, partly due to its high metastatic potential. This disease presents frequently with splenic rupture and hemorrhage. We report the case of a 17-year-old woman who presented with rupture of a primary splenic angiosarcoma.Case presentationThe patient presented with diffuse abdominal pain and distention. Clinical examination revealed severe tenderness in the left upper abdominal quadrant, a palpable abdominal mass, and hemodynamic instability with a systolic arterial blood pressure of 75 mmHg and heart rate of 135 beats per minute. Blood tests revealed anemia (hemoglobin 7.0 g/dl) and thrombocytopenia (platelets 70 × 109/liter). After initial fluid resuscitation and stabilization, abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography were performed, revealing a large quantity of intraperitoneal free fluid, an enlarged spleen, and a heterogeneous low-density signal within the splenic parenchyma, which showed varying degrees of contrast enhancement. At laparotomy a huge (weight 1530 g, diameter 19 cm) actively bleeding spleen was identified and splenectomy was performed. Histopathology showed a primary splenic angiosarcoma. After an uneventful recovery, the patient was discharged on the sixth postoperative day.ConclusionPrimary splenic angiosarcoma is rare. Although this malignancy is usually encountered in advanced age, there have been a few reported cases among younger patients. The case reported here presented with splenic rupture, was treated by laparotomy and splenectomy, and the patient is disease free 16 months after surgery.

No abstract