Increasing age and postoperative infection are most strongly associated with POAF. Adoption of enhanced recovery protocols, along with more rigorous monitoring and early treatment of postoperative infection may help reduce POAF and its associated morbidity. Rhythm assessment is crucial to identify persistent AF after discharge, and clinicians should be vigilant for recurrence of AF at follow-up.

A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether the extent of pulmonary resection affects survival in patients with synchronous multiple primary lung cancers undergoing curative surgery. A total of 724 papers were identified using the reported searches, of which 14 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, date, journal, country, study type, population, outcomes and key results are tabulated. All studies were retrospective. Eight of 14 studies found no difference in terms of median, overall or progression-free survival when a sublobar resection in the form of a wedge resection or segmentectomy was performed for at least one of the synchronous lesions. Two studies demonstrated a negative impact on survival when lobectomy or bilobectomy was not performed for each lesion. Five papers reviewed the role of pneumonectomy in this category of patients and four of them demonstrated that such an extended resection has a significantly negative impact on survival, while, in one study, although pneumonectomy when compared with sublobar resections and photodynamic therapy had decreased long-term survival, this difference did not reach statistical significance. The use of lung-sparing resections (wedge resection or segmentectomy) of at least one lesion (if technically feasible) is advised for patients with synchronous multiple primary lung cancers. Most studies do not demonstrate any differences in immediate or long-term survival with two anatomical resections. Embarking for anatomical lung resections in the form of lobectomies should be done only in those cases where there are no concerns about postoperative pulmonary reserve. The performance of a pneumonectomy should be avoided, especially for bilateral synchronous lesions, unless it is absolutely necessary.

Lymphovascular invasion is associated with a worse overall survival in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer regardless of tumor stage. Parietal pleural involvement, N2 nodal disease, and advanced age independently predict poor overall survival.

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'in patients with primary lung carcinoma, does the sequence of pulmonary vasculature ligation during anatomical lung resection influence the oncological outcomes?' A total of 48 papers were found using the reported search, of which 7 represented the best evidence to answer the question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Among six prospective studies included, five of them randomized patients to either pulmonary vein or artery occlusion first during anatomical lung resection, while one study was retrospective. Two reports did not find any difference between pulmonary vein and artery occlusion first during long-term follow-up in terms of either disease recurrence (51 vs 53%, P = 0.7), or 5-year overall survival (54 vs 50%, P = 0.82). One report did not find any difference with regard to circulating tumour cells either after thoracotomy (5.0 vs 3.9, P = 0.4), or after the completion of lobectomy (38.0 vs 70.0, P = 0.23). One report found a higher expression of CD44v6 (P = 0.008) and CK19 (P = 0.05) in patients undergoing pulmonary arterial occlusion first. One report found that pulmonary vein occlusion before that of the pulmonary arterial branches has a favourable outcome on circulating carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) mRNA in the peripheral blood, while another one did not find a significant difference in circulating levels of CEA mRNA (P = 0.075) and CK19 mRNA (P = 0.086) with either method. Another study reported no correlation between circulating pin1 mRNA levels in peripheral blood after the completion of the resection and the sequence of ligation of pulmonary vessels (9.95 ± 0.91 vs 14.71 ± 1.64, P > 0.05). Based on the two studies assessing the long-term outcome of patients with primary lung cancer undergoing anatomical curative resection, the sequence of ligation of pulmonary vessels does not seem to influence the oncological outcomes or survival. However, the other studies focusing on the influence of these techniques on circulating tumour cells or their molecular products report conflicting results the clinical consequences of which cannot be predicted.

Objective: to validate the proposed N descriptor revision on a large cohort of patients and assess the impact of tumour location on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases for patients with NSCLC. Methods: This is a retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients who had anatomical lung resections. Systematic lymph node dissection was done for all patients. Results: Between January 2009 and December 2019 2566 patients had surgical resection for NSCLC. 448 patients (17.5%) had histologically confirmed lymph node metastases: 257 (57.4 %) had pN1 and 191 pN2. Median age of the study population was 69.1 years. Overall survival (OS) for study population was 37.3 months with 5-year survival rate of 35.7 %. The survival analysis of the N subgroups showed the pN2 patients had a median OS of 27.9 months vs. 41.7 months for pN1 patients (p = 0.013). Analysis as per the new proposal of the N subgroups N1a vs N1b vs N2a1 vs N2a2 vs N2b showed that median survival OS was 41.7 vs. 39.2 mo vs. 33.3 mo vs. 28.9 mo vs. 24.6 mo (p = 0.099). There was statistically significant difference in survival between N2 patients with skip metastasis and N2 patients without skip metastases: OS 32.2 (95 % CI: 16.8-47.6) months vs. 24.2 months (p = 0.024). On multivariate analysis only pathological N (p = 0.011) and the new proposed N classification (p = 0.006) were independent prognostic factors for survival. Conclusions: N1 and N2 disease are heterogeneous groups and require further stratification. The number of N2 lymph node stations involved and the presence or not of N1 disease translated to significant differences in survival and therefore have to be included in N staging.

Objectives: To assess whether preoperative levels of physical activity predict the incidence of post-operative complications following anatomical lung resection. Methods: Levels of physical activity (daily steps) were measured for 15 consecutive days using pedometers in 90 consecutive patients (prior to admission). Outcomes measured were cardiac and respiratory complications, length of stay, and 30-day re-admission rate. Results: A total of 78 patients’ datasets were analysed (12 patients were excluded due to non-compliance). Based on steps performed they were divided into quartiles; 1 (low physical activity) to 4 (high physical activity). There were no significant differences in age, smoking history, COPD, BMI, percentage predicted FEV1 and KCO and cardiovascular risk factors between the groups. There were significantly fewer total complications in quartiles 3 and 4 (high physical activity) compared to quartiles 1 and 2 (low physical activity) (8 vs 22; P = .01). There was a trend ( P > .05) towards shorter hospital length of stay in quartiles 3 and 4 (median values of 4 and 5 days, respectively) compared to quartiles 1 and 2 (6 days for both groups). Conclusions: Preoperative physical activity can help to predict postoperative outcome and can be used to stratify risk of postoperative complications and to monitor impact of preoperative interventions, ultimately improving short term outcomes.

The use of pursestring sutures in thoracic surgery is an outdated practice that causes not only unsightly scars but is also associated with increased pain. Furthermore, these unnecessary pursestring sutures place a burden on the patient and health care system to have them removed.

No abstract