Postoperative pain after lumbar arthrodesis is related to soft tissue and muscle dissection and to manipulations and removal at the operation site. By blocking noxious stimuli from the surgical area, infiltration and wound perfusion with ropivacaine were more effective in controlling pain than systemic analgesia.
The results of this study show that EMF can act in concert with IGF-I in stimulating PG synthesis in bovine articular cartilage explants. As this effect is not maintained in chondrocyte monolayers, the native cell-matrix interactions in the tissue may be fundamental in driving the EMF effects. These data suggest that in vivo the combination of both EMF and IGF may exert a more chondroprotective effect than either treatment alone on articular cartilage.
Synovial fibroblasts (SFs) contribute to the development of osteoarthritis (OA) by the secretion of a wide range of pro-inflammatory mediators, including cytokines and lipid mediators of inflammation. Previous studies suggest that electromagnetic fields (EMFs) may represent a potential therapeutic approach to limit cartilage degradation and control inflammation associated to OA, and that they may act through the adenosine pathway. Therefore, we investigated whether EMFs might modulate inflammatory activities of human SFs from OA patients (OASFs) treated with interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and the possible involvement of adenosine receptors (ARs) in mediating EMF effects. EMF exposure induced a selective increase in A(2A) and A(3) ARs. These increases were associated to changes in cAMP levels, indicating that ARs were functionally active also in EMF-exposed cells. Functional data obtained in the presence of selective A(2A) and A(3) adenosine agonists and antagonists showed that EMFs inhibit the release of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) and the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8), while stimulating the release of interleukin-10 (IL-10), an antinflammatory cytokine. These effects seem to be mediated by the EMF-induced upregulation of A(2A) and A(3) ARs. No effects of EMFs or ARs have been observed on matrix degrading enzyme production. In conclusion, this study shows that EMFs display anti-inflammatory effects in human OASFs, and that these EMF-induced effects are in part mediated by the adenosine pathway, specifically by the A(2A) and A(3) AR activation. Taken together, these results open new clinical perspectives to the control of inflammation associated to joint diseases.
Background and purpose:Adenosine is an endogenous modulator, interacting with four G-protein coupled receptors (A1, A2A, A2B and A3) and acts as a potent inhibitor of inflammatory processes in several tissues. So far, the functional effects modulated by adenosine receptors on human synoviocytes have not been investigated in detail. We evaluated mRNA, the protein levels, the functional role of adenosine receptors and their pharmacological modulation in human synoviocytes. Experimental approach: mRNA, Western blotting, saturation and competition binding experiments, cyclic AMP, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and nuclear factor (NF)-kB activation, tumour necrosis factor a (TNF-a) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) release were assessed in human synoviocytes isolated from patients with osteoarthritis. Key results: mRNA and protein for A1, A2A, A2B and A3 adenosine receptors are expressed in human synoviocytes. Standard adenosine agonists and antagonists showed affinity values in the nanomolar range and were coupled to stimulation or inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. Activation of A2A and A3 adenosine receptors inhibited p38 MAPK and NF-kB pathways, an effect abolished by selective adenosine antagonists. A2A and A3 receptor agonists decreased TNF-a and IL-8 production. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase or Gs pathways were involved in the functional responses of A3 or A2A adenosine receptors. Synoviocyte A1 and A2B adenosine receptors were not implicated in the inflammatory process whereas stimulation of A2A and A3 adenosine receptors was closely associated with a down-regulation of the inflammatory status.
Conclusions and implications:These results indicate that A2A and A3 adenosine receptors may represent a potential target in therapeutic modulation of joint inflammation.
An active phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) has been shown in nuclei of different cell types. The products of this enzyme, i.e. inositides phosphorylated in the D3 position of the inositol ring, may act as second messengers themselves. Nuclear PI3K translocation has been demonstrated to be related to an analogous translocation of a PtdIns(3,4,5)P 3 activated PKC, the j j isozyme. We have examined the issue of whether or not in the osteoblast-like clonal cell line MC3T3-E1 there may be observed an insulin-like growth factor-I-(IGF-I) and platelet-derived growth factor-(PDGF) dependent nuclear translocation of an active Akt/PKB. Western blot analysis showed a maximal nuclear translocation after 20 min of IGF-I stimulation or after 30 min of PDGF treatment. Both growth factors increased rapidly and transiently the enzyme activity of immunoprecipitable nuclear Akt/PKB on a similar time scale and after 60 min the values were slightly higher than the basal levels. Enzyme translocation was blocked by the specific PI3K inhibitor, LY294002, as well as cell entry into S-phase. Confocal microscopy showed an evident increase in immunostaining intensity in the nuclear interior after growth factor treatment but no changes in the subcellular distribution of Akt/PKB when a LY294002 pre-treatment was administered to the cells. These findings strongly suggest that the intranuclear translocation of Akt/PKB is an important step in signalling pathways that mediate cell proliferation. ß
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.