Background: Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is an innovative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was designed to better evaluate liver functions in HCC. Methods: We studied, retrospectively, data from patients treated with SIRT for HCC. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of radioembolization-induced liver disease (REILD). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: 222 patients were studied. The ALBI grade 1 patients had significantly less REILD (3.4%) after the first SIRT than ALBI grade 2 or 3 patients (16.8%, p = 0.002). Of the 207 patients with data, 77 (37.2%) had a worsening of ALBI grade after one SIRT. The baseline ALBI grade was significantly associated with OS (p = 0.001), also in the multivariable analysis. The ALBI grade after the first SIRT was significantly associated with OS (p ≤ 0.001), with median OS of 26.4 months (CI 95% 18.2–34.7) for ALBI grade 1 patients (n = 48) versus 17.3 months (CI 95% 12.9–21.8) for ALBI grade 2 patients (n = 123) and 8.1 months (CI 95% 4.1–12.1) for ALBI grade 3 patients (n = 36). Conclusions: The baseline ALBI grade is a strong predictor of REILD. The baseline ALBI score and variations of ALBI are prognostic after SIRT.
Purpose: Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has been proposed for combination with immunotherapy to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the toxicity of radiation towards lymphocytes is understudied after SIRT. The aim of this study was to describe variations of lymphocytes following SIRT, and their potential prognostic impact. Materials & Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 164 patients treated with SIRT for HCC Lymphocytes count and Neutrophils-to-lymphocytes (NLR) ratio were evaluated at baseline and at 3 months. Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). Results: Median baseline lymphocyte count was 1.32Giga/Liter (G/L) (Standard deviation
These results indicate that a deficient MGMT status in PNETs, determined by loss of protein expression in IHC or by the presence of MGMT gene promoter methylation measured by MS-PCR, is not associated with a better response to TMZ-based chemotherapy and cannot be used as a predictive marker to lead treatment decisions.
Quality of life (QoL) in oncology is an outcome becoming more and more important and relevant to explore. Some studies have demonstrated its prognostic impact in different cancers, such as colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers, but also in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Different tools have been developed for assessing quality of life, some general, such as EORTC QLQ-C30, but also specific tools depending on cancer origin which seem to be more pertinent for patients. Systemic treatments and specific symptoms due to cancer evolution could decrease quality of life. For approval of new systemic treatments, authorities ask for benefit in terms of efficacy but also benefit in quality of life, which is crucial for patients. This review reports data about QoL in HCC, including specific tools used, impact of systemic treatments and prognosis for QoL for HCC patients. Management of adverse events is essential to enhance compliance with treatment and quality of life. Assessing quality of life in clinical trials appears quite systematic, but its application in clinical routine requires development.
This retrospective study included all consecutive patients who were treated by SIRT for HCC BLCC (Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer) B or C in our institution [5]. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, ECOG ≤2, eligibility to SIRT, Child ≤ B8, treatment in one session, use of glass or resin microsphere. Exclusion criteria were pulmonary estimated dose >30 gy, microspheres' flow in the gastrointestinal tract. This work was accepted by our institutional review board. All procedures performed in studies involving
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.