Background: Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is an innovative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was designed to better evaluate liver functions in HCC. Methods: We studied, retrospectively, data from patients treated with SIRT for HCC. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of radioembolization-induced liver disease (REILD). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: 222 patients were studied. The ALBI grade 1 patients had significantly less REILD (3.4%) after the first SIRT than ALBI grade 2 or 3 patients (16.8%, p = 0.002). Of the 207 patients with data, 77 (37.2%) had a worsening of ALBI grade after one SIRT. The baseline ALBI grade was significantly associated with OS (p = 0.001), also in the multivariable analysis. The ALBI grade after the first SIRT was significantly associated with OS (p ≤ 0.001), with median OS of 26.4 months (CI 95% 18.2–34.7) for ALBI grade 1 patients (n = 48) versus 17.3 months (CI 95% 12.9–21.8) for ALBI grade 2 patients (n = 123) and 8.1 months (CI 95% 4.1–12.1) for ALBI grade 3 patients (n = 36). Conclusions: The baseline ALBI grade is a strong predictor of REILD. The baseline ALBI score and variations of ALBI are prognostic after SIRT.
Purpose: Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has been proposed for combination with immunotherapy to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the toxicity of radiation towards lymphocytes is understudied after SIRT. The aim of this study was to describe variations of lymphocytes following SIRT, and their potential prognostic impact. Materials & Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 164 patients treated with SIRT for HCC Lymphocytes count and Neutrophils-to-lymphocytes (NLR) ratio were evaluated at baseline and at 3 months. Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). Results: Median baseline lymphocyte count was 1.32Giga/Liter (G/L) (Standard deviation
This retrospective study included all consecutive patients who were treated by SIRT for HCC BLCC (Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer) B or C in our institution [5]. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, ECOG ≤2, eligibility to SIRT, Child ≤ B8, treatment in one session, use of glass or resin microsphere. Exclusion criteria were pulmonary estimated dose >30 gy, microspheres' flow in the gastrointestinal tract. This work was accepted by our institutional review board. All procedures performed in studies involving
e22008 Background: Oral temozolomide capsule is approved for the treatment of glioma and malignant glioblastoma in adults and in Europe in children over 3-years. As recommended by international pediatric medical associations, temozolomide is also used for the treatment of high-risk relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma, a solid tumor affecting young children. Nevertheless, capsules are not adapted to the pediatric population leading caregivers to handle temozolomide capsules, which bears major risks (i.e. dose inaccuracy, temozolomide instability and exposure to cytotoxic drug). To overcome this situation, a temozolomide oral suspension (Kimozo) was developed. The aim of this phase I study was to demonstrate bioequivalence between the temozolomide oral suspension and the temozolomide capsules (Temodal) and to assess the general and local safety in adult patients. Methods: A randomized, open-label, two-way crossover, single-dose bioequivalence study was performed in 8 centers. Adult patients with primary malignancies and treated with temozolomide 200 mg/m² as monotherapy received a single oral administration of the oral suspension (test) or capsule (reference) on days 1 and 2 of a 5-day cycle, depending on the randomization, and under fasting conditions. Fourteen blood samples were collected over 10-hr in each period for pharmacokinetic purpose. General and buccal safety was assessed along the study. The assessment of bioequivalence was based upon 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio of the population geometric means (test/reference) for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC0-t). Results: Among the thirty-six patients enrolled in the study, thirty were assessable for pharmacokinetic primary endpoint. The point estimate and the 90% CI of the ratios of Cmax and AUC0-t were 107.62 (98.07-118.09) and 97.18 (95.05-99.35), respectively. The results obtained satisfy the bioequivalence criteria of the Bioequivalence Guidelines (90% CI between 80.00% and 125.00%). Neither serious adverse events nor adverse events of special interest (i.e. mucositis) were reported. Conclusions: The oral suspension of temozolomide (Kimozo) and capsule of temozolomide (Temodal) are bioequivalent under fasting conditions in patients with CNS primary malignancies, supporting that they are therapeutic equivalent. Clinical trial information: NCT04467346.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.