Background
Adenocarcinomas of the appendix represent a heterogeneous disease depending upon the presence of mucinous histology, histologic grade, and stage. We sought to explore the interplay of these factors with systemic chemotherapy in a large population dataset.
Methods
Patients in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) with mucinous, non-mucinous and signet-ring cell type appendiceal neoplasms from 1985-2006 were selected. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were developed.
Results
11,871 patients met our inclusion criteria: 50.3% mucinous, 40.5% non-mucinous and 9.2% signet-ring cell. 5-year overall survival (OS) stratified by grade was similar across stage I-III disease but not for stage IV disease. Median OS for stage IV mucinous and non-mucinous histology was 6.4 and 2.3 years for well differentiated (p<0.0001) and 1.5 and 0.8 years for poorly differentiated (p<0.0001), respectively. In multivariable modeling for stage I-III disease, adjuvant chemotherapy improved OS for both mucinous and non-mucinous histologies: HR of 0.78 (0.68-0.89; p=0.0002) and 0.83 (0.74-0.94;p=0.002) respectively. For stage IV disease systemic chemotherapy was significant for non-mucinous 0.72 (0.64-0.82; p<0.0001) but not mucinous 0.95 (0.86-1.04; p=0.2) histologies, though this was grade dependent. Median OS for chemotherapy vs. no chemotherapy was 6.4 versus 6.5 years. (p=not significant) for mucinous well differentiated and 1.6 versus 1.0 years. (p=0.0007) for mucinous poorly differentiated.
Conclusions
Adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated a significant OS benefit regardless of histology. However, for stage IV disease the benefit of systemic chemotherapy varied by histology and grade, with well differentiated mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinomas deriving no survival benefit from systemic chemotherapy.
Both occult lateral spread and fragmented tumor patterns are common findings after CRT. Despite the potential of occult spread to mislead surgeon choice of resection margin, its presence did not influence oncological outcome in this series.
Obesity is a risk factor for colorectal cancer based on its molecular and metabolic effects on insulin and IGF-1, leptin, adipocytokines, and sex hormones. Obese men have a higher risk of colorectal cancer compared with normal weight men, but the association between obesity and rectal cancer is weaker than with colon cancer. There is a weaker association between obesity and colon cancer in women than in men, and no appreciable association between obesity and rectal cancer in women. Although obesity does not seem to have an effect on the number of lymph nodes harvested with resection, obesity does seem to be associated with more-aggressive colorectal cancers in a handful of studies. Survival and local recurrence studies are contradictory with no conclusive evidence that obesity predisposes to worse overall survival or increased recurrence in colon and rectal cancers. The literature is not definitive as far as overall morbidity and mortality rates in the obese are concerned, though obese rectal cancer patients seem to incur proportionally more morbidity and mortality. Preexisting steatosis or steatohepatitis in obese colorectal cancer patients or chemotherapy-induced liver dysfunction may lead to an increased mortality in obese patients with colorectal liver metastases. Diabetes may cause poorer response to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer and contribute to higher mortality and recurrence in colon cancer.
Background-Several disease processes of the colon and rectum, including constipation and incontinence, have been associated with abnormalities of the autonomic nervous system. However, the autonomic innervation to the colon and rectum are not fully understood. The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of stimulation of vagus nerves, pelvic nerves (PN) and hypogastric nerves (HGN) on colorectal motility in rats.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.