Landslides are destructive geological hazards that occur all over the world. Due to the periodic regulation of reservoir water level, a large number of landslides occur in the Three Gorges Reservoir area (TGRA). The main objective of this study was to explore the preference of machine learning models for landslide susceptibility mapping in the TGRA. The Wushan segment of TGRA was selected as a case study. At first, 165 landslides were identified and a total of 14 landslide causal factors were constructed from different data sources. Multicollinearity analysis and information gain ratio (IGR) model were applied to select landslide causal factors. Subsequently, the landslide susceptibility mapping using the calculated results of four models, namely, support vector machines (SVM), artificial neural networks (ANN), classification and regression tree (CART), and logistic regression (LR). The accuracy of these four maps were evaluated using the receive operating characteristic (ROC) and the accuracy statistic. Results revealed that eliminating the inconsequential factors can perhaps improve the accuracy of landslide susceptibility modelling, and the SVM model had the best performance in this study, providing strong technical support for landslide susceptibility modelling in TGRA.
A landslide susceptibility map (LSM) is the basis of hazard and risk assessment, guiding land planning and utilization, early warning of disaster, etc. Researchers are often overly keen on hybridizing state-of-the-art models or exploring new mathematical susceptibility models to improve the accuracy of the susceptibility map in terms of a receiver operator characteristic curve. Correlation analysis of the causal factors is a necessary routine process before susceptibility modeling to ensure that the overall correlation among all factors is low. However, this overall correlation analysis is insufficient to detect a high local correlation among the causal factor classes. The objective of this study is to answer three questions: 1) Is there a high correlation between causal factors in some parts locally? 2) Does it affect the accuracy of landslide susceptibility assessment? and 3) How can this influence be eliminated? To this aim, Wanzhou County was taken as the test site, where landslide susceptibility assessment based on 12 causal factors has been previously performed using the frequency ratio (FR) model and random forest (RF) model. In this work, we conducted a local spatial correlation analysis of the “altitude” and “rivers” factors and found a sizeable spatial overlap between altitude-class-1 and rivers-class-1. The “altitude” and “rivers” factors were reclassified, and then the FR model and RF model were used to reevaluate the susceptibility and analyze the accuracy loss caused by the local spatial correlation of the two factors. The results demonstrated that the accuracy of LSMs was markedly enhanced after reclassification of “altitude” and “rivers,” especially for the RF model–based LSM. This research shed new light on the local correlation of causal factors arising from a particular geomorphology and their impact on susceptibility.
Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) can provide valuable information for local governments in landslide prevention and mitigation. Despite significant improvements in the predictive performance of LSM, it remains a challenge to be carried out in areas with limited availability of data. For example, in the early stage of road construction, landslide inventory data can be particularly scarce, while there is a high need to have a susceptibility map. This study aims to set up a novel procedure for coupling the knowledge-driven and data-driven models for LSM in an area with limited landslide inventory data. In particular, we propose a two-step approach. The first step consists of applying four data-driven models (logistic regression, decision tree, support vector machines, and random forest (RF)) to derive a regional susceptibility map. In the second step, the application of a heuristic model (analytic hierarchy process, AHP) is proposed to calculate a local susceptibility map for the areas with incomplete landslide inventories. The final landslide susceptibility map is obtained by merging the most accurate regional map (RF) with the local map. We apply this novel procedure to a landslide-prone region with developed road construction (National Highway G69) in Wanzhou district, where landslide inventory is difficult to update due to timely recovery from landslide-induced road damage. Results show that the proposed methodology allows identifying new landslide-prone areas, and improving LSM predictive performance, as demonstrated by the fact that two new landslides developed along G69 were perfectly classified in the highly susceptible areas. The results show that implementing the landslide susceptibility assessment with different geographical settings and combining them into best-sensitivity partitions is more accurate than focusing on creating new models or hybrid models.
For partially submerged landslides, hydrostatic and hydrodynamic pressures, related to water level fluctuation and rainfall, are usually expressed in the form of porewater pressure, seepage force, and buoyancy. There are some connections among them, but it is very easy to confuse one force with another. This paper presents a modified mathematical expression for stability analysis of partially submerged landslide and builds the relationship between porewater pressures and buoyancy acting on the underwater zone of partially submerged landslide and the relationship among porewater pressures, seepage force, and buoyancy acting on partially submerged zone. The porewater pressures acting on the underwater slice are calculated using hydrostatic forces, and the porewater pressures acting on the partially submerged slice are estimated by an approximation of equipotential lines and flow lines under the steady state seepage condition. The resultant of the porewater pressures acting on the underwater slice equals the buoyancy, and that acting on the partially submerged slice is equivalent to the vector sum of seepage force and the buoyancy. The result shows there are two equivalent approaches for considering the effect of water on landslide stability in the limit equilibrium method. One is based on total unit weight and porewater pressures, and the other is in terms of the buoyant weight and the seepage force. The study provides a modified model for simplifying the complex boundary porewater pressures in limit equilibrium analysis for the stability of the partially submerged landslide.
<p>The landslide development laws vary in different landslide-prone areas, hence the susceptibility models often perform in varied ways in different regions. Due to the periodic regulation of reservoir water level, a large number of landslides occur in the Three Gorges Reservoir area (TGRA). These landslides seriously threaten the safety of local residents and their property. It is crucial to find the model that can generate a landslide susceptibility map with higher accuracy in the TGRA. The main objective of this study was to explore the preference of machine learning models for landslide susceptibility mapping in the TGRA.</p><p>The Wushan segment of TGRA was selected as a case study, which is located in the middle reaches of the TGRA, the southwest of China. In this study, 165 landslides were identified and 14 landslide causal factors were constructed from different data sources at first, including altitude, slope, aspect, curvature, plan curvature, profile curvature, stream power index, topographic wetness index (TWI), terrain roughness index, lithology, bedding structure, distance to faults, distance to rivers, and distance to gully. Subsequently, multicollinearity analysis and information gain ratio model were applied to select landslide causal factors. After removing five factors (altitude, TWI, profile curvature, plan curvature, curvature), the landslide susceptibility mapping using the calculated results of four models, which were support vector machines (SVM), artificial neural networks, classification and regression tree, and logistic regression. Finally, the accuracy of the four models was evaluated and compared using the accuracy statistic methods and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC). The results of accuracy analysis showed that the SVM model performed the best. At the same time, the SVM performance behavior for susceptibility modelling in other areas were collected. In these regions, the accuracy of SVM was always larger than 0.8. We could see that SVM performed acceptably in different regions, and thus it can be used as a recommended model in TGRA and other landslide-prone regions.</p><p>In this study area, a total of 62% of the landslides were within 300 m from the Yangtze River, and the distance to rivers was the most important factor. The impoundment of the TGRA impacted the landslide development in three aspects: (1) the long-term immersion of reservoir water gradually reducing the strength of rock (soil) at the saturated zone (mostly near the Yangtze river), reducing the resistance force of landslide; (2) the strong dynamic action of water enhancing the lateral erosion on the bank slope, changing the slope shape, and thus reducing the slope stability; (3) the periodic fluctuation of the reservoir water making the self-weight, static, and dynamic water pressure of the landslide change, which could increase the resistance force or reduce the sliding force of the landslide and even cause overall instability and damage. Hence, in order to reduce the losses caused by landslides in TGRA, we should pay more attention to the early warning of reservoir bank landslides.</p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.