Quantitative indexes measured by a commercial workstation showed good correlation not only with the extent of DILD estimated by visual inspection but also with PFT results. Quantitative indexes can be used as an objective tool for quantitative evaluation of disease extent and for follow-up of the progression or improvement of a DILD.
• Non-invasive diagnosis of non-neoplastic cysts can save surgical biopsy or excision. • Conventional CT or MRI findings cannot always provide a confident diagnosis. • Mediastinal masses can be well-characterised with DWI. • Non-neoplastic mediastinal cysts show significantly higher ADC values than cystic tumours. • DWI is useful to determine treatment strategy.
PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the image quality of ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) and its diagnostic performance in making a specific diagnosis of pneumonia in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancy.Materials and MethodsULDCT was performed prospectively in 207 febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancy. Three observers independently recorded the presence of lung parenchymal abnormality, and also indicated the cause of the lung parenchymal abnormality between infectious and noninfectious causes. If infectious pneumonia was considered the cause of lung abnormalities, they noted the two most appropriate diagnoses among four infectious conditions, including fungal, bacterial, viral, and Pneumocystis pneumonia. Sensitivity for correct diagnoses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for evaluation of diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Interobserver agreements were determined using intraclass correlation coefficient.ResultsOf 207 patients, 139 (67%) had pneumonia, 12 had noninfectious lung disease, and 56 had no remarkable chest computed tomography (CT) (20 with extrathoracic fever focus and 36 with no specific disease). Mean radiation expose dose of ULDCT was 0.60±0.15 mSv. Each observer regarded low-dose CT scans as unacceptable in only four (1.9%), one (0.5%), and three (1.5%) cases of ULDCTs. Sensitivity and area under the ROC curve in making a specific pneumonia diagnosis were 63.0%, 0.65 for reader 1; 63.0%, 0.61 for reader 2; and 65.0%, 0.62 for reader 3; respectivelyconclusionULDCT, with a sub-mSv radiation dose and acceptable image quality, provides ready and reasonably acceptable diagnostic information for pulmonary infection in febrile neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancy
All solid subcentimeter nodules having initial 2-year stability at screening LDCT can be considered benign because none shows growth at further follow-up CT. On the other hand, subcentimeter GGNs have more chance of growth than solid nodules and need further follow-up CT for more than 2 years.
A cutoff value of 0.32 using the ratio of the shortest width of the lateral meniscus and the longest width of the tibia are probably useful to help distinguish between complete DLM and incomplete DLM. Additionally, the new ratio using the width of the medial meniscus is also useful to improve distinguishing between the types of DLM.
The radiologic findings of a single nodule from Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) have been rarely reported. We described a case of granulomatous PJP manifesting as a solitary pulmonary nodule with a halo sign in a 69-year-old woman with diffuse large B cell lymphoma during chemotherapy. The radiologic appearance of the patient suggested an infectious lesion such as angioinvasive pulmonary aspergillosis or lymphoma involvement of the lung; however, clinical manifestations were not compatible with the diseases. The nodule was confirmed as granulomatous PJP by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery biopsy.
• In an Asian non-high-risk group, LDCT helps detect more early-staged LCAs. • CT-detected lung cancers in non-high-risk subjects demonstrate better survival than CXR-detected cancers. • CT-detected lung cancers in non-high-risk subjects are predominantly part-solid or non-solid adenocarcinomas. • Mortality benefit of LDCT screening in non-high-risk subjects needs to be investigated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.