Students rank requires several considerations and criteria. Determination of the criteria must be prepared as much as possible because it is related to the selection of outstanding students. However, this ranking is considered less than optimal and requires a long time because it is processed manually by the school. The right Decision Support System is needed to produce quick and accurate ranking decisions. This study uses the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) as a Decision Support System. This method will use multi-criteria as the main input in decision making. PROMETHEE will be used to analyze criteria based on alternatives compared to rank according to students' grades and abilities. Based on the research sample data, the highest value was 0.739 for alternative A16. This shows that alternative A16 is the best alternative compared to other alternatives based on consideration of all criteria. The development of PROMETHEE with application-based Decision Support Systems is much better because it produces fast and accurate calculations.
For companies, employees are an important aspect that must be supported by quality human resources. In the selection of permanent employees, usually the leadership in a company conducts an objective selection process in accordance with predetermined criteria. However, leaders often face several problems in this process, such as the selection is carried out in stages so that it takes a long time and the assessment of prospective employees is still done manually, making mistakes often occur. Therefore, a decision support system is needed as a solution to these problems by applying a comparison of the Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis (OCRA) method and the Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) method and the weighting obtained by the Rank Order Centroid (ROC) method. The test results obtained the best alternative that is considered feasible as a permanent employee is in the same alternative, namely A5 on behalf of Risa Sabrani. The OCRA method produces the best preference value of 1.56 while the MAUT method produces the best preference value of 0.456 as the first rank
The head of the study program is a figure who plays an important role in the progress of each study program at a university. The head of the study program has a role in the decision-making process and in carrying out managerial policies. In addition, the head of the study program is also a person who is able to ensure the creation of a conducive atmosphere in the service process to students and also the scope of work in the study program. Therefore, awarding the head of the study program based on the performance shown is a form of appreciation for the performance given by the head of the study program. The process of evaluating the performance of the head of the study program is not only an assessment of the academic field but also an assessment of the managerial. In the process of evaluating the performance of the head of the study program, a computerized tool is needed or commonly called a Decision Support System. The decision support system also has several settlement methods that are used as a reference, one of the methods that can be used is the WASPAS method. In addition to the methods used to support decisions, there are also methods that can be used for weighting each assessment criteria such as the ROC method. In this research, we will use the ROC weighting method on the assessment criteria and the process of evaluating the performance of the head of the study program using the WASPAS method. The results achieved in the research are to obtain an objective and accountable process of evaluating the performance of the study program leader. In the research that has been carried out, it is found that the Head of the Study Program who gets the reward is the Head of the Study Program with alternative A2 and the preferred value is 0.958
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.