This study examined associations between maltreatment and early developmental vulnerabilities in a population sample of 68,459 children (M = 5.62 years, SD = .37) drawn from the Australian state of New South Wales, using linked administrative data for the children and their parents (collected 2001-2009). Associations were estimated between (a) any maltreatment, (b) the number of maltreatment types, and (c) the timing of first reported maltreatment and vulnerability and risk status on multiple developmental domains (i.e., physical, social, emotional, cognitive, and communication). Pervasive associations were revealed between maltreatment and all developmental domains; children exposed to two or more maltreatment types, and with first maltreatment reported after 3 years of age, showed greater likelihood of vulnerability on multiple domains, relative to nonmaltreated children.

No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundThe extent to which poor academic achievement is associated with later schizophrenia is unclear. The aim of the present study was to update our prior meta-analyses which examined academic achievement in youth aged 16 years or younger who later developed schizophrenia or schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and those who did not (Dickson et al, 2012, Psychological Medicine, 42, 743–755). We also conducted a new meta-analysis on published studies that reported on general academic achievement in youth at-risk for schizophrenia/SSD aged 16 years or younger compared to typically developing youthMethodsIn addition to the five studies included in our earlier meta-analyses, a further three prospective investigations of birth or genetic high-risk cohorts were identified that reported results using objective measures of general academic achievement and of mathematics achievement for individuals who did and did not develop schizophrenia/SSD in adulthood. For our new meta-analysis we identified a total of seven studies that met the following inclusion criteria: (1) written in English; (2) objective measure of general academic achievement consisting of scores on least two core academic subjects (i.e., literacy and mathematics) at age 16 years or younger; (3) results provided for youth at high risk for developing schizophrenia/SSD in adulthood by virtue of having at least one first-degree relative with the disorder or reporting psychotic like-experiences (PLEs); and (4) sufficient data to calculate effect sizes.ResultsMeta-analyses showed that by age 16 years, individuals who later developed schizophrenia/SSD presented with significantly poorer general academic achievement (d=-0.26) and mathematics achievement (d=-0.21). Findings also indicated that during adolescence, youth with a family history of schizophrenia/SSD and youth reporting PLES were characterised by significantly lower general academic achievement than healthy peers (d=-0.39; d=-0.53, respectively).DiscussionThese results show that poor academic achievement precedes illness onset, and may represent an easily identifiable non-specific marker of biological, psychological and social risk processes underpinning the development of schizophrenia/SSD.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Parental offending and mental illness are associated with an increased risk of criminal behaviour in offspring during adolescence and adulthood, but the impact of such problems on younger children, including children's experiences of victimisation, is less well known. Aim: To investigate the associations between parental offending and mental illness recorded prior to their offspring's age of 5 years and their offspring's contact with police as a 'person of interest', 'victim' or 'witness' between ages 5 and 13 years. Methods: Our sample consisted of 72,771 children and their parents drawn from the New South Wales Child Development

Purpose The London Child Health and Development Study (CHADS) is a prospective, longitudinal investigation of children, sampled from the general community aged 9-11 years and assessed biennially, who present premorbid risk markers for schizophrenia. The study aims to characterise developmental trajectories of psychological, cognitive, and biological functioning in atrisk children and identify potential targets for early preventative intervention. This review summarises CHADS findings, discusses these in the context of recent theory regarding aetiology and prevention of schizophrenia, and highlights challenges to be addressed with future research. Methods We review (1) epidemiological information on the prevalence and correlates of developmental antecedents of schizophrenia in the general child population, (2) evidence of psychosocial, cognitive, and biological dysfunctions in at-risk children presenting multiple antecedents of schizophrenia and at-risk children with a family history of schizophrenia, and (3) related findings from an associated sample of helpseeking children receiving intervention. Results Community-based screening of 9-11-year olds identified *9 % with a triad of antecedents of schizophrenia [including psychotic-like experiences (PLEs)] who are putatively at-risk of psychosis; these children reported greater exposure and responsivity to stressors, impairments in general intelligence and specific cognitive functions, brain structure and function abnormalities, and neuromotor dysfunction. Preliminary evidence suggests distressing PLEs are a viable target for cognitive-behavioural intervention in at-risk children. Conclusions Intervention in early, premorbid phases of illness might alleviate current difficulties and avert future schizophrenia using benign treatments. The CHADS programme has identified several markers that may index early pathophysiology and constitute potential targets for preventative intervention.