Background Outpatient surgeries account for 60–70% of all procedures. Increased surgical duration has been demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTEs) after inpatient surgeries. In contrast, it is currently unknown if surgical duration increases the risk of VTEs for outpatient surgeries. Materials and methods The 2005 through 2016 NSQIP Participant Use Data Files were queried to extract all patients scheduled for outpatient surgery. A z-score for surgical duration was calculated for each procedure to allow for standardization across surgeries of expected shorter or longer duration. The primary outcome measured was incidence of VTEs within 30 days of surgery. Results A total of 3474 patients out of 1,863,523 (0.19%) had a VTE. After adjusting for confounding factors, the first and fifth quintiles compared to the middle quintile had odds ratios (ORs) of 0.75 (95% CI 0.68, 0.80) and 1.43 (95% CI, 1.35%–1.52%), respectively, P < 0.001. Patients who developed VTEs were more likely to be readmitted to the hospital, OR (95%CI) of 51.9 (48.0–56.2), C statistic = 0.67. Conclusion Surgical duration is associated with the development of VTEs after outpatient surgery. While the overall incidence of VTE is low and does not require generalized prophylaxis, clinical practitioners should consider prophylaxis for patients undergoing outpatient surgery performed with excessive time compared to the average surgical procedure duration.
Background and Objectives. Methadone is commonly used in chronic pain, but it is not frequently used as an intraoperative analgesic. Several randomized studies have compared intraoperative methadone to morphine regarding postsurgical analgesia, but they have generated conflicting results. The aim of this investigation was to compare the analgesic efficacy of intraoperative methadone to morphine in patients undergoing surgical procedures. Methods. We performed a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar electronic databases. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model, weighted mean differences (WMD), standard deviation, 95% confidence intervals, and sample size. Methodological quality was evaluated using Cochrane Collaboration’s tool. Results. Seven randomized controlled trials evaluating 337 patients across different surgical procedures were included. The aggregated effect of intraoperative methadone on postoperative opioid consumption did not reveal a significant effect, WMD (95% CI) of −0.51 (−1.79 to 0.76), (P=0.43) IV morphine equivalents. In contrast, the effect of methadone on postoperative pain demonstrated a significant effect in the postanesthesia care unit, WMD (95% CI) of −1.11 (−1.88 to −0.33), P=0.005, and at 24 hours, WMD (95% CI) of −1.35 (−2.03 to −0.67), P<0.001. Conclusions. The use of intraoperative methadone reduces postoperative pain when compared to morphine. In addition, the beneficial effect of methadone on postoperative pain is not attributable to an increase in postsurgical opioid consumption. Our results suggest that intraoperative methadone may be a viable strategy to reduce acute pain in surgical patients.
with great interest the article of Lynch and colleagues 2 in a recent issue of the American Journal of Sports Medicine. The authors performed a randomized study on 60 patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and concluded that there is similar efficacy in perioperative pain control with the use of an adductor canal block when compared with a femoral nerve block. The authors should be applauded for performing a well-designed study on an important topic (ie, acute pain) in patients undergoing surgery. 4,6 The need to improve postoperative recovery by reducing moderate to severe postoperative pain makes the topic very important in perioperative medicine. 1,5 Although the study of Lynch et al 2 was well conducted, there are some critical points that need to be clarified by the authors to support their findings. First, it is unclear if the subjects received the same intra-and postoperative analgesics, as this has the potential to directly alter the study outcomes. It is possible that patients who were allocated to the femoral nerve group received more intraoperative analgesics and therefore had less pain than those patients in the adductor canal group. Last, it is not clear who collected the study data. It is known that postoperative pain scores collected by clinical nurses are not reliable for analgesic studies. 3 I would welcome comments by the authors, as this would help to further substantiate the findings of this important study.
Aneurysm of a pulmonary vein is a rare vascular anomaly that is usually discovered incidentally as a pulmonary nodule or mediastinal mass. Most patients do not have any symptoms but some patients can present with dyspnea, hemoptysis, or cerebral thromboembolism. Proper diagnosis is crucial as to avoid unnecessary testing or surgical procedures. We highlight a case of an asymptomatic 59-year-old female with a pulmonary vein aneurysm presenting as a 1.5 cm right infrahilar nodule on contrast-enhanced CT during evaluation for acute cholecystitis. Further investigation with MRA revealed that it was vascular in nature, and pulmonary angiography showed dilation of the right inferior pulmonary vein with no communication to the pulmonary artery. On serial imaging, there has been no change in the size of the aneurysm. A small non-enlarging pulmonary vein aneurysm should be managed expectantly.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.