A systematic review of the literature was performed to assess the necessity of a pyloric drainage procedure during an esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. Earlier data recommend performing a pyloric drainage procedure for all esophagectomies; however, recent studies have questioned this. A thorough literature search (January 2001-November 2011) was performed using the terms esophagectomy, pyloroplasty, pyloromyotomy, botulinum toxin, and pyloric drainage. Only studies that compared patient outcome after undergoing an esophagectomy with a pyloric drainage procedure with those undergoing an esophagectomy without a pyloric drainage procedure were selected. Only four studies, comprising 668 patients in total, were identified that compared patient outcome after undergoing an esophagectomy with or without a pyloric drainage procedure, and two additional meta-analyses were identified and selected for discussion. All studies were retrospective, and because of the heterogeneity of studies, patient demographics, reporting, and statistical analysis of patient outcome, pooling of data and meta-analysis could not be performed. Careful analysis demonstrated that pyloric drainage procedure was associated with a non-significant trend for delayed gastric emptying and biliary reflux, while not affecting the incidence of dumping. No correlation was determined between a pyloric drainage procedure and anastomotic leaks, postoperative pulmonary complications, length of hospital stay, and overall perioperative morbidity. While there are risks associated with a pyloric drainage procedure and data exist supporting its omission during an esophagectomy, no good conclusion can be drawn from the current literature. Larger multi-institutional, prospective studies are required to definitively answer this question.
One of the most morbid postoperative complications after a lobectomy or a pneumonectomy is a bronchopleural fistula (BPF). The diagnosis and identification of BPF may be challenging, often requiring repeat imaging and invasive tests, including bronchoscopy, thoracoscopic exploration, or even open exploration. The purpose of this article is to review the types and presentations of BPF and to describe the role of noninvasive imaging for diagnosis and surgical treatment planning. We focused on multidetector computed tomography and advanced postprocessing applications such as multiplanar reconstructions, virtual bronchoscopy, and volume rendering images, including minimum-intensity and maximum-intensity projections. Both multidetector computed tomography and nuclear scintigraphy are reliable noninvasive imaging modalities that can be used expeditiously in an outpatient setting and may prove to be a more cost-effective strategy to identify the fistula as well as conduct postoperative surveillance. These modalities can be used for accurate and efficient testing for earlier diagnosis and treatment planning, thereby significantly improving patient outcome. Additional advanced postprocessing techniques using already acquired imaging data can provide complementary information that is both visually accessible and anatomically meaningful for the surgeon. Better understanding of the potential uses and benefits of these techniques will eventually improve the diagnostic accuracy, optimize preoperative planning, and facilitate follow-up for patients with BPF with improved patient outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.