No abstract
In this chapter, we discuss some of the unique concerns that arise when authors need to work together to produce documents. We begin by defining co-authorship and then discuss some of the unique properties and considerations of co-authored documents, including managing the division of labor, producing interim project management documents, and harnessing the productive potential of conflict. We end by discussing the ways that new technologies are creating opportunities for new forms of co-authorship and new pairings of potential co-authors, including international collaborations that require coauthors to negotiate multilingual text production. A narrative of failureIn her analysis of a student team's failure to produce a workable concept design for a major Research and Development company, Rebecca Burnett (1996) highlights many of the key issues in professional collaborative writing. Burnett studied a 13-member team of student engineers charged with developing a real technical design, but given little guidance on how to work collaboratively. Left to their own devices, the students developed a non-hierarchical team structure without clear definitions of roles and responsibilities, leaving team members with little understanding of how their individual work related to the overall, final group document. This confusion was exacerbated by the fact that team members never documented their weekly team meetings or other verbal interactions. Without shared written documentation, team members developed remarkably different understandings of the team's purpose. When a technical writer was eventually added to this team, her documentation of meetings and decisions helped team members address conflicts that had hitherto been invisible. So important were these interim, planning documents that the technical writer quickly became perceived as the project leader despite her lack of engineering background. However, this structure arrived too late into the project: the design and recommendations the students developed never achieved an audience beyond their immediate supervisor. Burnett's (1996) narrative of failure underscores many of the unique aspects of collaborative writing that we discuss in this chapter: the need for a clear structure to manage the collaboration; the importance of interim planning documents such as meeting minutes, schedules, and charters; the often productive role of conflict in the project; and the relationship between verbal and written communication. In the following sections, we discuss many of the key concepts and controversial issues in co-authored text productions.
The following article aims at examining the question in how far the text pattems influences the text production process. In an experimental study, German and Polish Students o f French were asked to write a letter o f application for a stage at the French enterprise Danone in groups o f two. The groups could be distinguished due to their state o f knowledge conceming the conventions o f a typical French letter o f application. In the article, I will show the différent states from their text product. Besides, I will then ask what this knowledge, or the lack o f it, may mean for the text production process. A t the end, the article will focus on a discussion conceming the question o f teaching writing in L2 and the idea o f providing foreign language student with text pattems for différent communicative tasks. 1 Vielen Dank an Ulrich Krafft fur das "Gliick des Autors". Ihm, Ulrich Dausendschôn-Gay, Elisabeth Giilich, Teresa Tomaszkiewicz und besonders Katrin Lehnen sei an dieser Stelle für zahlreiche Anregungen gedankt. 5 Die grôBere Anzahl von polnischen Paaren ist durch einen làngeren Forschungsaufenthalt an der Adam-Mickiewicz-Universitât in Poznan begriindet. An dieser Stelle môchte ich dem DAAD ftir die Unterstützung wâhrend meines Auslandsaufenthaltes im Rahmen seines Doktorandlnnenprogrammes danken.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.