This study examines the issue of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) policy discrepancies in reducing waste management and the occurrence of distortion of disagreement between the city's government and the private sector in interpreting the contents and the scope of the policy in luenced by the interests of various stakeholders, the private sector and daily workers. This study uses a qualitative approach on the results of ethical and emic data, discussing the content of short-term project-oriented policies, which are limited to the transport of waste to cause long-term policy orientation anomalies in the trash business, thus impacting the accumulation of waste on the road, termination of unilateral contracts and demonstrations by daily workers. For this reason, PPP policy implementation shows high interest but has a low contribution to the community in Pekanbaru.
Pelangi Waste Bank is a foster from the Siak Regency Government under the coordination of the Environmental Service (DLH). The activities of the waste bank are quite good, but they still need assistance in marketing by making brochures and bookkeeping administration in the form of savings books. This activity is supported by PT Chevron's CSR funds, which encourage modern institutional governance that is in line with current needs. With a participatory discussion approach, investigation and assistance, the process of preparing brochures and passbooks can run smoothly and according to needs. Even administratively, it has an impact on strengthening the organization, namely the waste bank institution.
This paper aims to elaborate the crises occurring in the science of public administration based on signifi cant conceptions of scholars. Public administration's initial emergence as a novel scientifi c discipline sparked a theoretical-conceptual debate specifi cally in the domain of epistemology. For the sake of systematical order, this paper is divided into three phases of crisis based on the dynamics of the theoretical-conceptual development of public administration, namely: (1) identity crisis; (2) paradigm crisis; and (3) intellectual crisis. The illustration of each crisis phase is aimed at conveying conception points of scientists which facilitates in reading the narrative of shift s and theoretical-conceptual contents including their inherent values. For this reason, a search or walkthrough of relevant literature is necessary to observe the development of thoughts in public administration. The study result shows that the diff ering ideas and argumentations which had occurred throughout every discussion on public administration have had implications on the heterogeneity of the public administration fi eld. The various shift s of locus-focus and paradigm in public administration is seen as a systematic att empt in fi nding its true self as a scientifi c discipline. The eff orts of public administration in separating itself from the shadows of political science was also observed, although being capable of truly separating itself is considered as extremely diffi cult, bearing in mind that the focus and locus of public administration is very much aff ected by constantly developing social political infl uences. In addition to that, various shift s of locus and focus seems to have empirical implications particularly in the scientifi c scope of public administration. Keywords:crisis; identity; paradigm; intellectual; public administration. Abstrak Makalah ini bertujuan melakukan elaborasi terhadap krisis pada disiplin Ilmu Administrasi
Indonesia sebagai salah satu negara yang menganut sistem demokrasi tetap melaksanakan pemilihan kepala daerah secara langsung meskipun kesehatan nasional menjadi ancaman. Tahapan kampanye tatap muka pada pemilihan kepala daerah menjadi salah satu sorotan negatif di tengah lonjakan kasus Covid-19, karena dikhawatirkan akan menimbulkan kluster baru kasus covid-19. Oleh sebab itu, penelitian ini akan memetakan dan mengeksplorasi persoalan pelanggaran protokol kesehatan pada tahapan kampanye yang dilakukan oleh calon kepala daerah. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan analisis isi dan fenomenologi sebagai metode. Pengumpulan data diawali dengan memetakan masalah pelanggaran protokol kesehatan pada tahapan kampanye melalui berita di 14 media terpilih. Hasil pemetaan berupa tren dan berbagai polemik pelanggaran dielaborasi dengan kasus pelanggaran yang terjadi di daerah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelanggaran terhadap protokol Kesehatan sangat tinggi pada masa kampanye hingga sampai pada pelanggaran dugaan tindak pidana. Kontestasi politik yang terjadi pada tahapan kampanye di masa pandemi tidak menjadi halangan bagi calon kepala daerah yang mengikuti pemilihan. Sehingga terlihat bahwa pemilihan yang terjadi di masa pandemi tidak berpihak kepada rakyat dikarenakan kepentingan politik calon kepala daerah lebih penting dibandingkan dengan Kesehatan masyarakat sebagai pelaku demokrasi itu sendiri. Mengesampingkan Kesehatan rakyat menjadi catatan buruk dalam pelaksanaan demokrasi.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.