A three-dimensional (3D) digital preoperative planning system for the osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures was developed for clinical practice. To assess the usefulness of the 3D planning for osteosynthesis, we evaluated the reproducibility of the reduction shapes and selected implants in the patients with distal radius fractures. Twenty wrists of 20 distal radius fracture patients who underwent osteosynthesis using volar locking plates were evaluated. The 3D preoperative planning was performed prior to each surgery. Four surgeons conducted the surgeries. The surgeons performed the reduction and the placement of the plate while comparing images between the preoperative plan and fluoroscopy. Preoperative planning and postoperative reductions were compared by measuring volar tilt and radial inclination of the 3D images. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the volar tilt and radial inclination were evaluated. For the implant choices, the ICCs for the screw lengths between the preoperative plan and the actual choices were evaluated. The ICCs were 0.644 (p < 0.01) and 0.625 (p < 0.01) for the volar tilt and radial inclination in the 3D measurements, respectively. The planned size of plate was used in all of the patients. The ICC for the screw length between preoperative planning and actual choice was 0.860 (p < 0.01). Good reproducibility for the reduction shape and excellent reproducibility for the implant choices were achieved using 3D preoperative planning for distal radius fracture. Three-dimensional digital planning was useful to visualize the reduction process and choose a proper implant for distal radius fractures. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:2646-2651, 2017.
Background: To assess the usefulness of three-dimensional (3D) digital pre-operative planning, we compared the radiographic parameters of the distal radius from 3D planning and conventional planning after osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures. We hypothesized that the use of 3D digital planning may improve radiographic outcomes for reduction and decrease the risk of correction loss.Methods: Sixty wrists of 60 distal radius fracture patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the order of hospital visits. Thirty wrists were treated with 3D preoperative planning as the plan group. Another thirty wrists were treated with conventional preoperative planning as the control group. Both groups were treated with volar locking plates. In the plan group, 3D digital preoperative planning and a surgical simulation were performed in order to determine the reduction and placement of the implants in addition to the plate/screw size prior to surgery. In the control group, conventional preoperative planning was performed. Ulnar variance, volar tilt, and radial inclination were measured at one week, three and six months after surgery. Difference of the measurement of radiographic parameters between operated and healthy side wrists were compared between plan and control groups at one week after surgery. Loss of corrections for radiographic parameters were compared between plan and control groups.Results: The differences between the operated and healthy side wrists were significantly smaller in the plan group compared to the control group for the volar tilt and radial inclination (p < 0.05).The loss of corrections for ulnar variance and volar tilt were significantly smaller in the plan group compared to the control group at six months after surgery (p < 0.05).Conclusions: 3D preoperative planning offers better reduction accuracy and reduces correction loss in the osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures.
Background: A three-dimensional (3D) digital pre-operative planning system for the osteosynthesis of distal radius fracture was developed. The objective of this study was to evaluate screw choices for three-dimensional (3D) digital pre-operative planning of osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures and to compare with the screw choices for the conventional method. Methods: Distal radius fracture patients who underwent osteosynthesis using volar locking plates were evaluated. Thirty wrists in the plan group utilized 3D preoperative planning, and nineteen wrists in the control group utilized conventional preoperative assessment. In the plan group, the 3D preoperative planning was performed prior to surgery. The reduction was simulated with 3D image, and the implant choice/placement also simulated on the 3D image. In the control group, standard preoperative planning was performed using posterior-anterior and lateral view radiographs, and CT scan. After the planning, osteosynthesis was performed. During the surgery, the operator performed the reduction and the placement of the plate while comparing images between the pre-operative plan and fluoroscopy. The distal screw lengths and the anteroposterior diameter of the radius along the axis of the distal screws were measured. The ratios of the screw length and radius diameter were evaluated. The screw/radius ratios within the range of 0.75–1.00 were considered appropriate. The screw choices less than 0.75, or greater than 1.00 were considered inappropriate. The rate of appropriate screw choices were compared between plan and control groups. Results: The results of appropriate screw choices were 86.1% and 74.8% in the plan group and the control group, respectively. The inappropriate screw choices were 14.0% and 25.2% in the plan group and the control group, respectively. The three-dimensional planning significantly increased appropriate screw choices compared to the conventional planning (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Three-dimensional digital preoperative planning is useful for the optimization of screw lengths in osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.