Background. The development of a sensitive method for the detection of breast carcinoma micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes is reported.
Methods. The method was based on amplification of MUCl mRNA, which encodes a core protein of polymorphic epithelial mucin, by a reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR). Total RNA, which was extracted from a breast carcinoma cell line (MCF‐7), primary breast carcinomas, and axillary lymph nodes, was subjected to analysis of MUCl mRNA expression by the RT‐PCR method.
Results. MUCl mRNA expression was detected by RT‐PCR in MCF‐7 cells and in all 15 primary breast carcinomas but not in control lymph nodes taken from patients with benign diseases. A serial dilution study revealed that MUCl RT‐PCR was a very sensitive method, detecting one MCF‐7 cell per 1,000,000 lymph node cells.
The detection sensitivity of MUCl RT‐PCR method was compared with that of immunohistochemical staining of an epithelial marker (polymorphic epithelial mucin). Fifty axillary lymph nodes were obtained from 15 patients with primary breast carcinomas, and metastasis in each lymph node was investigated by both methods. The immunohistochemical method demonstrated metastasis in nine lymph nodes, and MUCl mRNA was detected in all of them. Of the 41 lymph nodes that were diagnosed to be devoid of metastasis by immunohistochemistry, MUCl mRNA was expressed by 6 but not by the other 35, indicating the presence of micrometastases in these 6 lymph nodes that could be detected only by the MUCl RT‐PCR method.
Conclusions. The MUCl RT‐PCR method is more sensitive than immunohistochemistry for the detection of micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes. This new method would be of practical value in selecting the patients at high risk for relapse from those who are histologically lymph node negative.
Intraoperative imprint cytology is a useful method for evaluating the status of sentinel nodes and is more accurate than frozen-section analysis. In addition, imprint cytology can detect micrometastasis more accurately than conventional haematoxylin and eosin-stained sectioning.
Sentinel node biopsy guided by indocyanin green dye is an easy technique with an acceptable success rate in detecting sentinel nodes and predicting axillary nodal status. Axillary node status, the presence or absence of lymphatic or vascular invasion in the tumor and patient age affect its success in identifying sentinel nodes.
Collagen gel droplet embedded culture-drug sensitivity test (CD-DST) is the newly developed in vitro chemosensitivity test that has several advantages over the conventional ones. The aim of the present study is to examine the clinical usefulness of this test in the prediction of response to chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Seventy patients with primary (n ؍ 45) or locally recurrent (n ؍ 25) breast cancers were recruited, and each patient underwent tumor biopsy before chemotherapy. The biopsy specimens were used for CD-DST and immunohistological examination of 6 biological markers (P-gp, erbB2, p53, BCL2, MIB1 and ER-␣). As chemotherapy, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m 2 plus epirubicin 60 mg/m 2 q3w (CE, n ؍ 28) or docetaxel 60 mg/m 2 q3w (DOC, n ؍ 42) was given. Interpretable results using the CD-DST assay were obtained from 84.3% (59/70) of tumor specimens studied. Of the 18 tumors diagnosed as CE sensitive by CD-DST, 15 (83.3%) exhibited a response to CE therapy and none of the 5 tumors diagnosed as CE resistant by CD-DST exhibited a response to CE therapy. Of the 14 tumors diagnosed as DOC sensitive by CD-DST, 13 (92.9%) exhibited a response to DOC therapy and only one of the 22 tumors diagnosed as DOC resistant by CD-DST exhibited a response to DOC therapy. P-gp expression was found to exhibit a significant (p < 0.05) association with the resistance to CE therapy but not to DOC therapy. Diagnostic accuracy (72.7%) achieved by P-gp was lower than that (87.0%) achieved by CD-DST in CE therapy. Expressions of other biological markers (erbB2, p53, BCL2, MIB1 and ER-␣) were not significantly associated with response to CE or DOC therapy. These results demonstrate that CD-DST can predict the response to CE and DOC therapy with a high accuracy in breast cancer patients and seems to be superior to the conventional predictors.
SPIO-enhanced MR imaging is a useful method of detecting metastases in sentinel nodes localized by CT-LG in patients with breast cancer and may avoid sentinel node biopsy when the sentinel node is diagnosed as disease-free.
The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the feasibility of periareolar injection of the contrast agent Sonazoid (SNZ) followed by ultrasonography (US) for the identification of sentinel lymph node (SLN) in breast cancer patients with clinically negative node. Patients (n = 100) with T1‐2N0M0 breast cancer received a periareolar injection of SNZ followed by US to identify contrast‐enhanced SLN. Each contrast‐enhanced SLN underwent fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) followed by SLN biopsy with a conventional method using blue dye and/or radiocolloid (B/R). In almost all cases, contrast‐enhanced lymphatic vessels were clearly visualized by US soon after the periareolar injection of SNZ and the SLNs were easily identified with an identification rate of 98% (98/100) for SNZ and 100% (100/100) for B/R. The number of SLNs identified by SNZ (SNZ‐SLN) (mean per patient, 1.52) was significantly lower than that identified by B/R (B/R‐SLN) (2.19) (P < 0.0001). Twenty‐five patients with positive SLNs had at least one positive SNZ‐SLN. On a node‐by‐node basis, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FNAC for SNZ‐SLNs (n = 149) were 33.3%, 99.2%, and 85.9%, respectively. Identification of SLN by periareolar injection of SNZ is a technically simple method with an identification rate as high as 98%. SNZ‐SLN thus seems to be a good target for FNAC, but sensitivity of FNAC for SNZ‐SLNs needs to be improved.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.