These results do not prove that valproate prophylactic treatment in pediatric patients with malignant brain tumors had an influence on their survival. However, our cohort showed an effect of higher size than the recent European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial analysis, even though not significant. Clinical trials with valproate in pediatric malignant brain tumors should be carefully planned, in order to detect a possible effect of this drug in survival.

Objectives: To estimate survival and evaluate prognostic factors of pediatric patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumors treated in a single center. Methods:Retrospective analysis of survival of 103 children with primary brain tumors diagnosed consecutively from January 2000 to December 2006. Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis of factors that affect overall survival to define possible prognostic factors.Results: Median and mean ages were 7.2 and 7.6 years. There was a male predominance (1.22:1). Most patients had medulloblastomas or primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET, 38%), or low-grade astrocytomas (18%). The anatomic site of most tumors was the cerebellum (49%) and the brain stem (21%). Five-year survival after diagnosis was 84% for low-grade astrocytomas and 51% for medulloblastomas and PNET. Prognostic factors for overall survival were histopathological type (highgrade astrocytomas and ependymomas; hazard ratio = 3.7 to 3.9), surgery (hazard ratio of 0.5 for completely resected tumors) and radiotherapy (hazard ratio of 0.5 for patients who underwent radiotherapy). Conclusions:Overall survival of pediatric patients with brain tumors in this study was similar to that found in populations of the United States and Europe. The prognostic factors defined for overall survival are also similar to those published in previous studies. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2011;87(5):425-32:Brain neoplasms, survival analysis, prognostic. ResumoObjetivos: Realizar análise de sobrevida e avaliar, através de análise multivariada, a influência de diversas variáveis na sobrevida, definindo fatores prognósticos de pacientes pediátricos com tumores do sistema nervoso central (SNC) tratados em um único centro.Métodos: Analisamos, retrospectivamente, a sobrevida de 103 crianças portadoras de tumores cerebrais primários, diagnosticadas consecutivamente no período entre janeiro de 2000 e dezembro de 2006. Análise multivariada de fatores influenciando a sobrevida global por regressão de Cox foi usada para definir possíveis fatores prognósticos. Resultados:A mediana e a média de idade foram de 7,2 e 7,6 anos. Houve predominância do sexo masculino (relação 1,22:1). A maioria dos pacientes tinha meduloblastoma ou tumores neuroectodérmicos primitivos (PNET, 38%) ou astrocitomas de baixo grau (18%). As topografias mais comuns foram cerebelar (49%) e tronco cerebral (21%). A sobrevida, 5 anos após o diagnóstico, foi de 84% para astrocitomas de baixo grau e 51% para meduloblastomas e PNET. Fatores prognósticos para a sobrevida global foram histopatológico (astrocitomas de alto grau e ependimomas, razão de risco entre 3,7 e 3,9), cirurgia (razão de risco 0,5 para tumores completamente ressecados) e radioterapia (razão de risco 0,5 para pacientes que receberam radioterapia). Conclusões:A sobrevida global de pacientes pediátricos com tumores cerebrais neste estudo é comparável àquela dos registros populacionais dos Estados Unidos e Europa. Os fatores de prognóstico definidos para sobrevida global também se assemelham àqueles ...

Although substantial progress has been made in pediatric brain tumor management, patients with brainstem tumors and high-grade gliomas, as well as patients less than 3 years of age with high-risk malignant tumors, have a poorer prognosis. The authors have been treating these patients with radiotherapy and standard carboplatin and vincristine chemotherapy. Since January 2007 the authors have been using valproate as anticonvulsant for prophylaxis. The authors performed a retrospective cohort analysis of pediatric patients with high-risk brain tumors treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and valproate prophylaxis, comparing this group with a historical control. The 2007-2008 group was comprised of 22 patients, 15 with brainstem tumors (7 diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma [DIPG], 3 focal, the remaining infiltrating with a solid portion), 4 with diencephalic tumors (2 thalamic), and 3 with supratentorial high-grade tumors (1 glioblastoma, 1 recurrent grade III ependymoma, 1 with gliomatosis). There were 15 patients alive (68%) after a mean follow-up time of 19 months. Survival function comparison by log rank test was highly significant (P = .004) with a hazard ratio of 0.31 (0.14-0.70). Radiological response showed 3 complete responses (14%), 8 partial responses (36%), 5 stable diseases (23%), and 5 progresssive diseases (23%). The authors hypothesize that valproate may have potentiated the antiangiogenic effect of vincristine, diminished expression of resistance to carboplatin, and sensitized tumor cells to radiotherapy. The authors suggest that clinical trials of carboplatin and vincristine associated with oral continuous low-dose valproate are indicated for pediatric patients with high-risk brain tumor.

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma is a pediatric oncologic disease with dismal prognosis and no effective treatment. Since 2007, our patients have been using valproic acid as prophylactic anticonvulsant. We have undertaken a retrospective study in order to evaluate the influence of valproate in the outcomes of children with this disease in our center. Patients were treated with weekly carboplatin and vincristine and received conformal radiotherapy, either concurrent or sequential. Event-free survival and overall survival of patients not treated with valproic acid were 6.5 and 7.8 months. Accelerated failure time model (a parametric multivariate regression test for time-to-failure data) showed a statistically significant superiority of the median event-free survival of treated patients (6.5 vs. 9.5 months in treated patients; HR 0.54-95 % CI 0.33-0.87; p < 0.05) and also of overall survival (7.8 vs. 13.4 months in treated patients; HR 0.60-95 % CI 0.37-0.98; p = 0.05).

PURPOSE To present a summary of the recommendations for the treatment and follow-up for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) as acquired through a questionnaire administered to 99 physicians working in the field of prostate cancer in developing countries who attended the Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference for Developing Countries. METHODS A total of 106 questions out of more than 300 questions addressed the use of imaging in staging mCRPC, treatment recommendations across availability and response to prior drug treatments, appropriate drug treatments, and follow-up, and those same scenarios when limited resources needed to be considered. Responses were compiled and the percentages were presented by clinicians to support each response. Most questions had five to seven relevant options for response including abstain and/or unqualified to answer, or in the case of yes or no questions, the option to abstain was offered. RESULTS Most of the recommendations from this panel were in line with prior consensus, including the preference of a new antiandrogen for first-line therapy of mCRPC. Important aspects highlighted in the scenario of limited resources included the option of docetaxel as treatment preference as first-line treatment in several scenarios, docetaxel retreatment, consideration for reduced doses of abiraterone, and alternative schedules of an osteoclast-targeted therapy. CONCLUSION There was wide-ranging consensus in the treatment for men with mCRPC in both optimal and limited resource settings.

Purpose The outcome of RCC has improved considerably in the last few years, and the treatment options have increased. LACOG-GU and LARCG held a consensus meeting to develop guidelines to support the clinical decisions of physicians and other health professionals involved in the care of RCC patients. Methods Eighty questions addressing relevant advanced RCC treatments were previously formulated by a panel of experts. The voting panel comprised 26 specialists from the LACOG-GU/LARCG. Consensus was determined as 75% agreement. For questions with less than 75% agreement, a new discussion was held, and consensus was determined by the majority of votes after the second voting session. Results The recommendations were based on the highest level of scientific evidence or by the opinion of the RCC experts when no relevant research data were available. Conclusion This manuscript provides guidance for advanced RCC treatment according to the LACOG-GU/LARCG expert recommendations.

No abstract

TPS14 Background: Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is an uncommon malignancy which accounts for 2,300 new cases and 400 deaths annually worldwide. However, in low-income countries from South America, Asia and Africa, incidence corresponds to 10-20% of all malignancies in men. Approximately 4% of PSCC patients present with metastatic disease at diagnosis. Also, even if diagnosed in early stages (localized disease), around 30% of patients will recur. No improvements have been achieved over the last three decades in platinum-based chemotherapy, which remains the standard-of-care; objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are currently at 20-30%, 3-4 months and 7-15 months, respectively. HPV16 is the most important known risk factor for PSCC. Favorable results have been achieved with Pembrolizumab in other HPV-associated cancers, such as cervical and oropharyngeal cancer. HERCULES (LACOG 0218) aims to evaluate the efficacy of pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced PSCC. Methods: HERCULES is a phase 2, single-arm, multicentric trial evaluating patients with histologically proven PSCC and metastatic disease (de novo or recurrent); or recurrent locally advanced disease not amenable to curative-intent therapy; or TanyN3M0 or T4NanyM0 (stage IV – AJCC 8th ed) not amenable to curative-intent therapy. Additional inclusion criteria were ECOG PS 0–1; measurable disease by RECIST 1.1; no prior systemic therapy for recurrent or metastatic disease (however, patients progressing after 12 months of neo/adjuvant chemotherapy completion are allowed). The primary endpoint is ORR up to week 24. Secondary endpoints are OS, PFS, clinical benefit rate, immune related response criteria, quality of life, safety, and predictive biomarkers of response/survival. Eligible subjects receive 5-FU 1000mg/m²/day IV D1-D4, cisplatin 70mg/m² or carboplatin AUC 5 IV D1 plus pembrolizumab 200mg IV D1 at each 3-week (Q3W) dosing cycle for 6 cycles, followed by Pembrolizumab 200mg IV Q3W maintenance. Patients without disease progression are allowed to continue pembrolizumab monotherapy until completing 34 cycles, disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, whichever comes first. Tumor evaluations are performed every 6 weeks until week 24. Sample size was calculated as 33 patients to detect an increase in ORR from 20% to 40% up to week 24 with 78.5% power and considering 10% drop-out. From Aug 2020 to Jul 2022, 33 patients were enrolled in 11 Brazilian research sites. Results are expected in 2023. NCT04224740. Clinical trial information: NCT04224740 .