High levels of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) are the leading cause of surface water quality impairments in the United States. Watershed-scale models are commonly used to identify relative contributions of watershed sources and to evaluate the effectiveness of remediation strategies. However, most existing models simplify FIB transport behavior as equivalent to that of dissolved-phase contaminants, ignoring the impacts of sediment on the fate and transport of FIB. Implementation of sediment-related processes within existing models is limited by minimal available monitoring data on sediment FIB concentrations for model development, calibration, and validation purposes. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate FIB levels in the streambed sediments as compared to those in the water column and to identify environmental variables that influence water and underlying sediment FIB levels. Concentrations of and enterococci in the water column and sediments of an urban stream were monitored weekly for 1 yr and correlated with a variety of potential hydrometeorological and physicochemical variables. Increased FIB concentrations in both the water column and sediments were most strongly correlated with increased antecedent 24-h rainfall, increased stream water temperature, decreased dissolved oxygen, and decreased specific conductivity. These observations will support future efforts to incorporate sediment-related processes in existing models through the identification of key FIB relationships with other model inputs, and the provision of sediment FIB concentrations for direct model calibration. In addition, identified key variables can be used in quick evaluation of the effectiveness of potential remediation strategies.
Elevated levels of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) remain the leading cause of surface water-quality impairments in the United States. Under the Clean Water Act, basin-specific total maximum daily load (TMDL) restoration plans are responsible for bringing identified water impairments in compliance with applicable standards. Watershed-scale model predictions of FIB concentrations that facilitate the development of TMDLs are associated with considerable uncertainty. An increasingly cited criticism of existing modeling practice is the common strategy that assumes bacteria behave similarly to "free-phase" contaminants, although many field evidence indicates a nontrivial number of cells preferentially associate with particulates. Few attempts have been made to evaluate the impacts of sediment on the predictions of in-stream FIB concentrations at the watershed scale, with limited observational data available for model development, calibration, and validation. This study evaluates the impacts of bacteria-sediment interactions in a continuous, watershed-scale model widely used in TMDL development. In addition to observed FIB concentrations in the water column, streambed sediment-associated FIB concentrations were available for model calibration. While improved model performance was achieved compared with previous studies, model performance under a "sediment-attached" scenario was essentially equivalent to the simpler "free-phase" scenario. Watershed-specific characteristics (e.g., steep slope, high imperviousness) likely contributed to the dominance of wet-weather pollutant loading in the water column, which may have obscured sediment impacts. As adding a module accounting for bacteria-sediment interactions would increase the model complexity considerably, site evaluation preceding modeling efforts is needed to determine whether the additional model complexity and effort associated with partitioning phases of FIB is sufficiently offset by gains in predictive capacity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.