Microbial Source Tracking: Methods, Applications, and Case Studies 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9386-1_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of Microbial Source Tracking in the TMDL Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, knowing the source of ENT is necessary for remediating coastal waters through the TMDL process (Benham et al, 2011). While it is tempting to look at the concentration of MST source-associated markers to assess their importance as sources of ENT in a system, this is not appropriate because feces from different hosts have different ratios of MST marker to ENT .…”
Section: Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, knowing the source of ENT is necessary for remediating coastal waters through the TMDL process (Benham et al, 2011). While it is tempting to look at the concentration of MST source-associated markers to assess their importance as sources of ENT in a system, this is not appropriate because feces from different hosts have different ratios of MST marker to ENT .…”
Section: Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pollutant loading information is critically important for watershed managers, as the current regulatory strategy informing remediation efforts is the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program under the U.S. Clean Water Act's sections 305(b) and 303(d), which quantifies target reductions in contamination per source in terms of loads rather than concentrations (Benham et al, 2011). Recent studies that have analyzed multiple discrete samples per storm event have noted that a single storm in an urban watershed could transport the same FIB loads as multiple years' of dry-weather loads, further emphasizing the need to focus on reductions of stormwater inputs of fecal contamination to reduce downstream impacts and exposure risks (Krometis et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An urban watershed study by Sercu et al (2011) provided evidence of leaking sanitary sewers directly contaminating storm drains with untreated sewage. In less urbanized or rural areas, bacterial contamination can come from sources such as septic systems, livestock, wildlife, and spreading of biosolids or septage on agricultural lands (Benham et al, 2011;USEPA, 2011). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) suggested that higher concentrations of FIB during base-flow conditions indicates a direct source to the stream that is not dependent on surface runoff, for example, leaking sewer lines, failing septic systems, and livestock or wildlife with direct access to the water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%