The data suggest this is a well tolerated regimen with modest response rates but with time to progression and survival rates similar to those reported for paclitaxel alone and relatively high rates of stable disease in this sample of patients.

No abstract

No abstract

Background The Food and Drug Administration issued a drug safety alert highlighting the potential association of docetaxel infusion with signs and symptoms of alcohol intoxication. This concern is significant because patients treated with docetaxel often have comorbidities and are prescribed concomitant centrally active medications. As a result, these patients may be at risk for iatrogenic events. Objective The objective of this study was to identify a correlation with docetaxel infusion and saliva ethanol concentration using a point-of-care ethanol test. Methods In this pilot study, ethanol concentrations were measured using a validated saliva ethanol test in patients receiving intravenous docetaxel as part of their chemotherapy regimen. Both ethanol dose and infusion rate were calculated based on the amount of the specific docetaxel product administered. Saliva ethanol concentrations were measured at baseline, immediately after infusion completion, and at 30 and 60 min postinfusion. Results A total of 17 patients were included in the analysis. The mean ethanol dose administered was 2.6 ± 0.5 g of ethanol per infusion of docetaxel with a mean infusion rate of 3.2 ± 0.7 ml of ethanol per hour. At baseline, immediately after infusion, and 30 and 60 min postinfusion, all patients had a saliva ethanol test result of 0 mg/dl. Conclusion Based on this small pilot study, the prediction of patients who will experience ethanol intoxication using a point-of-care saliva ethanol test based on the docetaxel dose administered is challenging. This observation requires confirmation in larger and more heterogeneous populations.

No abstract

A new disposable bleeding time device (Hemalet) was tested in 20 normal individuals and 11 patients with various bleeding disorders. The results were compared with those of Simplate II. The mean bleeding time for normal individuals was 5.4 +/- 1.5 (mean +/- 1 SD) minutes by Hemalet and 5.8 +/- 1.4 (mean +/- 1 SD) minutes by Simplate II, with good correlation between the results by the two devices (r = 0.81). The bleeding time in patients with various bleeding disorders were also comparably prolonged between the two devices. The new disposable bleeding time device with a disposable blade has quick release (penetration) into skin and retraction, and offers an alternative means of a bleeding time test.

No abstract

No abstract