Assessments of water repellency of soils are commonly made on air‐dried or oven‐dried samples, without considering the soil water content. The objectives of this study were to examine the spatial and temporal variability of soil water content, actual water repellency over short distances, and the variations in critical soil water contents. Between 22 Apr. and 23 Nov. 1999, numerous samples were collected from a grass‐covered dune sand (typic Psammaquent), at six depths, eight times in transects and two times in soil blocks. The water drop penetration time (WDPT) test was used to measure the actual water repellency of the field‐moist samples and the potential water repellency after drying the samples at 25, 65, and 105°C. Highly spatial and temporal variability in water content and persistence of actual water repellency was found between the samples from all soil depths. At each depth we established an upper water content, below which samples were water repellent and a lower water content, above which samples were wettable. This water content range, called the transition zone, was different for each depth, and, for example, assessed at 0‐ to 2.5‐cm depth between soil water contents of 18 and 23% (vol./vol.), and at 16.5‐ to 19‐cm depth between 2 and 5% (vol./vol.). The potential water repellency of samples dried at 25 and 65°C was on some days less severe than the actual repellency of field‐moist samples on other days, thus underestimating the maximal persistence of water repellency that can occur in the field. Drying of the samples at 105°C significantly increased the potential water repellency.

No abstract

Soil water repellency is much more wide-spread than formerly thought. During the last decades, it has been a topic of study for soil scientists and hydrologists in at least 21 States of the USA, in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, Colombia, Chile, Congo, Nepal, India, Hong Kong, Taiwan, China, Ecuador, Venezuela, Brazil, Mali, Japan, Israel, Turkey, Egypt, South Africa, Germany, The Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, United Kingdom, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Poland, Slovakia, Russia, France, Italy, and Greece. Although, water repellent soils already have been indicated at the end of the nineteenth century, they have been discovered and studied in most countries in the last decades. Water repellency is most common in sandy soils with grass cover and in nature reserves, but has also been observed in loam, heavy clay, peat, and volcanic ash soils. From 1940 to 1970 research was focussed on identifying vegetation types responsible for inducing water repellency and on developing techniques to quantify the degree of water repellency. Of special interest has been the effects of wildfire on the development of soil water repellency and its consequences for soil erosion. Due to increasing concern over the threat to surface and groundwater posed by the use of agrichemicals and organic fertilisers, studies on water repellent soils have also been focused on its typical flow behavior with runoff and the existence of preferential flow paths. Since the end of the 1950s, wetting agents and clay amendments have been studied to ameliorate water repellent soils. Since 1883, more than 1200 articles related to soil water repellency have been published in journals, reports, and theses. An exponential increase in number of publications started in 1960, resulting in an average of 200 publications per 5 years.

[1] In this paper we describe a simple and quick method for determining the presence of water repellency in a soil by using a small core sampler (1.5 cm in diameter, 25 cm long) and applying the water drop penetration time (WDPT) test at different depths on the sandy soil cores. Obtained results provide spatial distribution patterns of water repellency in a soil profile, demonstrating seasonal changes in repellency. An advantage of the method is that the soil is not disturbed by the sampling. For assessment of the persistence of water repellency in strongly to extremely water repellent soils, and for determination of the critical soil water contents, the WDPT test and volumetric water content determinations should preferably be performed in the laboratory.

The transport of a bromide tracer was studied in a heavy clay soil. After applying the tracer on day 0, water and bromide content profiles in the unsaturated zone were determined on days 6, 46, 209, 335, and 572. Furthermore, water samples were taken frequently from the groundwater and drain discharge and analyzed for bromide content. In the clay soil studied, solute transport occurred in three domains: large continuous macropores, smaller more tortuous mesopores, and the pores inside the soil aggregates. Bromide transport through the first domain, i.e., preferential flow through large macropores, amounted only to a few percent. This resulted, however, in maximum bromide concentrations in groundwater and drain discharge. Quantitatively, the most important solute transport occurred through the mesopores. This transport was characterized by high spatial variability, significant lateral transport, and low mobile water volumes (6%). At the field scale this resulted in the rapid leaching of solute in comparison with earlier experiments on sand and loam soils. After only 6 days and 34 mm net precipitation, the average bromide concentration peak had reached a depth of 55 cm. In spite of the heterogeneous transport and the presence of preferential flow, field‐average solute concentration profiles exhibited regular and smooth shapes. Solute transport inside the soil aggregates played only an indirect role, i.e., via solute retardation as a result of convection and diffusion into the aggregates.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract