Background Whether to perform an end-to-end (ETE) versus end-to-side (ETS) arterial anastomosis is an integral part of preoperative planning and intraoperative decision making in free flap-based reconstructions. This study evaluated the impact of microsurgical anastomotic technique on outcomes of lower extremity reconstructions, with a focus on patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Methods Over a 6-year period, 425 patients underwent 437 microvascular lower extremity free flap reconstructions with fasciocutaneous anterolateral thigh- or gracilis muscle flaps at a single surgical center. The cases were divided into an ETE (n = 297 patients) versus ETS (n = 128 patients) group according to the anastomotic technique. A retrospective analysis of patients' demographics, perioperative details, surgical complications, free flap types, recipient sites, flap survival, and the potential impact of PAD on outcomes was performed. Patient groups were comparable regarding comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, types of performed free flaps and recipient sites. Results We found no significant differences between the ETE versus ETS groups regarding the rate of major or minor complications (p > 0.05). Specifically, in patients suffering from PAD (n = 64) the type of arterial anastomosis had no effect on the outcome. Conclusion Overall, no significant differences in outcomes were observed when comparing the types of performed arterial anastomosis. This observation also held true for the subgroup of patients with PAD. Given that an ETS anastomosis did not increase the risk to encounter complications while preserving distal perfusion, we believe that this technique is the method of choice, especially in patients with impaired vascular status.

Despite the regenerative capabilities of peripheral nerves, severe injuries or neuronal trauma of critical size impose immense hurdles for proper restoration of neuro-muscular circuitry. Autologous nerve grafts improve re-establishment of connectivity, but also comprise substantial donor site morbidity. We developed a rat model which allows the testing of different cell applications, i.e., mesenchymal stem cells, to improve nerve regeneration in vivo. To mimic inaccurate alignment of autologous nerve grafts with the injured nerve, a 20 mm portion of the sciatic nerve was excised, and sutured back in place in reversed direction. To validate the feasibility of our novel model, a fibrin gel conduit containing autologous undifferentiated adipose-derived stem cells was applied around the coaptation sites and compared to autologous nerve grafts. After evaluating sciatic nerve function for 16 weeks postoperatively, animals were sacrificed, and gastrocnemius muscle weight was determined along with morphological parameters (g-ratio, axon density & diameter) of regenerating axons. Interestingly, the addition of undifferentiated adipose-derived stem cells resulted in a significantly improved re-myelination, axon ingrowth and functional outcome, when compared to animals without a cell seeded conduit. The presented model thus displays several intriguing features: it imitates a certain mismatch in size, distribution and orientation of axons within the nerve coaptation site. The fibrin conduit itself allows for an easy application of cells and, as a true critical-size defect model, any observed improvement relates directly to the performed intervention. Since fibrin and adipose-derived stem cells have been approved for human applications, the technique can theoretically be performed on humans. Thus, we suggest that the model is a powerful tool to investigate cell mediated assistance of peripheral nerve regeneration.

No abstract

No abstract

Several studies have attempted to identify the optimal anthropometric measurement for the aesthetically ideal positioning of the nipple–areolar complex. However, no standardised solutions and measurements for planning surgical procedures have been reached. The aim of this study is to identify the optimal anthropometric measurement between the suprasternal notch (SSN)–nipple distance and mid-clavicle (MC)–nipple distance for the aesthetic position of the nipple–areola complex (NAC) on the breast. A detailed online survey was sent to 300 board-certified plastic surgeons and residents of plastic surgery departments of hospitals in German, Austrian, and Swiss. A similar survey was also provided to 100 patients who had planned or had already undergone breast surgery. All participants were asked to rank the attractiveness of a series of women’s breasts in images with different NAC position measurements. The images showed breasts from two different measurements and distances: all the breasts had equal dimensions and proportions and the same areola size. Complete datasets were obtained from 203 of the 300 board-certified plastic surgeons and residents of plastic surgery departments in German-speaking countries (recall 68%) and from 100 patients. The majority of doctors and patients find a symmetrical breast with a mirrored position of the nipple–areola complex more attractive than a non-symmetrical breast. In cases with minor measurement differences, such as 0.5 cm (SSN vs. MC), there is no relevant difference in the breast symmetry. However, at larger distances, the MC-to-nipple distance is superior for achieving aesthetically appealing symmetry compared with the SSN-to-nipple distance. Using the MC-to-nipple distance seems to be superior for correct nipple positioning than the SSN-to-nipple distance and is a valuable preoperative measurement option for breast symmetry with correct nipple height. Further studies on this topic involving a more general population should be conducted to confirm the improvements in perception with the preoperative measurements using the anatomical landmarks.