Due to the high demand of ultra-low power in digital application, the needs of energy efficient analog-to-digital converter (ADC) are really essential. The comparator being an important part of successive approximation register (SAR)-ADC needs to have optimum performance under low power condition. This paper presents the comparison on power consumption together with the output performance flow power SAR-ADC dynamic comparators from three different design proposed by previous researchers. The three circuits is simulated and compared in terms of power consumption, regeneration time, reset time and output transient. The simulation is using Cadence Spectre and setup with 0.18µm CMOS technology, VDD at 0.8V and clock speed 2 at MHz. The analysis results obtained provides the lowest voltage input different (ΔVin) possible for double tail dynamic comparator using 0.18µm CMOS technology while adhering to the 45 corner process requirement. The results can be used as references for further design of ultra-low power dynamic comparator.
Power consumption and speed are the main criteria in designing comparator for analog-to-digital converter (ADC). This paper presents an optimized low voltage low power dynamic comparator which is robust to process, voltage and temperature (PVT) variations with adequate speed. The comparator circuit was designed using 0.18µm CMOS technology with low voltage supply of 0.8V. The method used to verify the robustness of the comparator circuit across 45 PVT is presented. The circuit is simulated with 10% voltage supply variation, five process corners and temperature variation from 0°C to 100°C. The simulation result show that the proposed comparator circuit achieved significant reduction of power consumption and delay during worst case condition compared to dynamic comparator proposed from previous researchers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.