Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Although CPAP was originally applied with a nasal mask, various interfaces are currently available. This study reviews theoretical concepts and questions the premise that all types of interfaces produce similar results. We revised the evidence in the literature about the impact that the type of CPAP interface has on the effectiveness of and adherence to OSA treatment. We searched the PubMed database using the search terms "CPAP", "mask", and "obstructive sleep apnea". Although we identified 91 studies, only 12 described the impact of the type of CPAP interface on treatment effectiveness (n = 6) or adherence (n = 6). Despite conflicting results, we found no consistent evidence that nasal pillows and oral masks alter OSA treatment effectiveness or adherence. In contrast, most studies showed that oronasal masks are less effective and are more often associated with lower adherence and higher CPAP abandonment than are nasal masks. We concluded that oronasal masks can compromise CPAP OSA treatment adherence and effectiveness. Further studies are needed in order to understand the exact mechanisms involved in this effect.
BACKGROUND: Chronic heart failure is commonly associated with inspiratory muscle weakness. However, few studies have investigated the risk factors for inspiratory muscle weakness in individuals with chronic heart failure and systolic dysfunction (left-ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <40%). METHODS: Seventy subjects were recruited in a cardiac center. We assessed clinical parameters, smoking history, peripheral muscle strength, pulmonary function, echocardiographic variables, and brain natriuretic peptide. The subjects were classified with inspiratory muscle weakness when the maximum inspiratory pressure was <70% of predicted values. RESULTS: Thirty-six subjects (51%) had inspiratory muscle weakness. The subjects with inspiratory muscle weakness and the subjects with no inspiratory muscle weakness were similar in age, sex, body mass index, medication use, and physical activity. However, the subjects with inspiratory muscle weakness had lower LVEF (P ؍ .003), systolic blood pressure (P ؍ .01), diastolic blood pressure (P ؍ .042), quadriceps muscle strength (P ؍ .02), lung function (P ؍ .035), increased brain natriuretic peptide (P ؍ .02), smoking history (P ؍ .01), and pulmonary hypertension incidence (P ؍ .03). Multivariate logistic regression analysis found a lower LVEF, increased smoking history, and lower systolic blood pressure as significant independent predictors for inspiratory muscle weakness. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lower LVEF, lower systolic blood pressure, and smoking history predicted inspiratory muscle weakness. Patients with suspected inspiratory muscle weakness should be examined and, if inspiratory muscle weakness exists, then inspiratory muscle training should be provided. Reducing inspiratory muscle weakness has the potential to improve many of the deleterious effects of chronic heart failure.
[Purpose] The aim of this study was to compare age-related differences in balance and
anthropometric posture measurements of the foot and to determine any relationship between
them. [Subjects and Methods] Sixty-eight older and 42 younger adults participated in this
study. Foot posture was tested for four domains: 1) hallux flexion and extension range of
motion using a goniometer, 2) navicular height and 3) length of the foot using a
pachymeter, and 4) footprint (width of forefoot, arch index and hallux valgus). Balance
was tested under two conditions on a force platform: bipodal in 60-s trials and unipodal
in 30-s trials. The sway area of the center of pressure and velocity in the
anteroposterior and mediolateral directions were computed. [Results] Older individuals
showed significantly poorer balance compared with younger adults under in the unipodal
condition (center of pressure area 9.97 vs. 7.72 cm2). Older people presented a
significantly lower hallux mobility and higher values for width of the forefoot and
transverse arch index than younger adults. The correlations between all foot posture and
center of pressure parameters varied across groups, from weak to moderate
(r −0.01 to −0.46). Low hallux mobility was significantly related to
higher center of pressure values in older people. [Conclusion] These results have clinical
implications for balance and foot posture assessments.
CPAP applied by a nasal mask is the gold standard treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Oronasal masks are an alternative interface that can be used, especially in subjects with predominant oral breathing. However, oronasal masks have higher costs, are associated with larger leaks and higher residual apnea-hypopnea index, and in some cases may be ineffective.
Oronasal breathing may adversely impact obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients either by increasing upper airway collapsibility or by influencing continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment outcomes. Predicting a preferential breathing route would be helpful to guide CPAP interface prescription. We hypothesized that anthropometric measurements but not self-reported oronasal breathing are predictors of objectively measured oronasal breathing. Seventeen OSA patients and nine healthy subjects underwent overnight polysomnography with an oronasal mask with two sealed compartments attached to independent pneumotacographs. Subjects answered questionnaires about nasal symptoms and perceived breathing route. Oronasal breathing was more common ( P = <0.001) among OSA patients than controls while awake (62 ± 44 vs. 5 ± 6%) and during sleep (59 ± 39 vs. 25 ± 21%, respectively). Oronasal breathing was associated with OSA severity ( P = 0.009), age ( P = 0.005), body mass index ( P = 0.044), and neck circumference ( P = 0.004). There was no agreement between objective measurement and self-reported breathing route among OSA patients while awake (κ = −0.12) and asleep (κ = −0.02). The breathing route remained unchanged after 92% of obstructive apneas. These results suggest that oronasal breathing is more common among OSA patients than controls during both wakefulness and sleep and is associated with OSA severity and anthropometric measures. Self-reporting is not a reliable predictor of oronasal breathing and should not be considered an indication for oronasal CPAP. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) interface choice for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients is often guided by nasal symptoms and self-reported breathing route. We showed that oronasal breathing can be predicted by anthropometric measurements and OSA severity but not by self-reported oronasal breathing. Self-reported breathing and nasal symptoms should not be considered for CPAP interface choice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.