Currently, there is no standard self-report measure of psychopathy in community-dwelling samples that parallels the most commonly used measure of psychopathy in forensic and clinical samples, the Psychopathy Checklist. A promising instrument is the Self-Report Psychopathy scale (SRP), which was derived from the original version the Psychopathy Checklist. The most recent version of the SRP (SRP-III; D. L. Paulhus, C. S. Neumann, & R. D. Hare, in press) has shown good convergent and discriminate validity and a factor structure similar to the current version of the Psychopathy Checklist (PCL-R; R. D. Hare, 1991, 2003). The analyses in the current study further investigated the viability of the SRP-III as a PCL-R-analogous measure of psychopathy in nonforensic and nonclinical samples by extending the validation process to a community sample. Using confirmatory factor analyses and logistic regressions, the results revealed that a four-factor oblique model for the SRP-III was most tenable, congruent with the PCL-R factor structure of psychopathy and previous research in which the SRP-III was administered to a student sample.

No abstract

Decision aids are an effective decision-support strategy for women considering genetic testing for breast/ovarian cancer risk, and are most effective before the patient has made a decision, which is generally at the point of having blood drawn.

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of a decision aid for women considering genetic testing for breast/ovarian cancer risk given during genetic counseling.Methods: One hundred and forty-eight women were randomized to receive the decision aid or a control pamphlet at the beginning of their first consultation with a genetic counselor. When the patient received the decision aid, it was used to complement consultation discussions about genetic testing. One hundred and ten (74.3%) women completed the first questionnaire designed to elicit information about women's levels of decisional conflict and knowledge about genetic testing. Of these, 105 (70.9%) completed a second questionnaire to assess longer-term outcomes, 6 months postconsultation.Results: Results showed that women who received the decision aid felt more informed about genetic testing (w 2 (1) 5 8.69; P 5 0.003), had clearer values (w 2 (1) 5 6.90; P 5 0.009) and had higher knowledge levels (w 2 (2) 5 6.49; P 5 0.039) than women who received the control pamphlet.Conclusions: The developed decision aid improved patient outcomes better than a control pamphlet when implemented during genetic counseling and given to the patient to take home.

The review revealed the complexity of individuals' attitudes toward donation and the need for more sophisticated future studies of the interactions between the broader factors influencing donation (such as social norms and existing legislation in each country) and individual factors, such as attitudes and beliefs. (Progress in Transplantation.

This article presents an analysis of rich data, gathered from interviews with 46 candidates and 38 supervisors from three Australian universities, about experiences of doctoral supervision in cross-cultural situations. Our analysis shows that many of the issues reported by international candidates are the same as those encountered by domestic candidates. However, this study has identified eight intensifiers that make such situations more complicated or difficult for candidates in a cross-cultural context: language; cultural differences in dealing with hierarchy; separation from the familiar; separation from support; other cultural differences; stereotypes; time; and what happens when the candidate returns home. The two intensifiers mentioned by more than 50% of interviewees are separation from the familiar and language. Using intensifiers as a conceptual framework for self-examination may help universities to better understand the real issues, to target resources, to mitigate distress to international candidates and reduce pressure on supervisors.

Five experiments employed a toxiphobia conditioning paradigm to examine the strengths of odour and flavour aversions when conditioned separately and in compound. When conditioned in compound, odour aversions were stronger than when conditioned 'separately, i.e., the flavour potentiated the odour (Experiment Ia), but flavour aversions were weaker than when conditioned separately, i.e., the odour attenuated the flavour (Experiment Ib). The duration of exposure to the reinforced compound governed the nature of the interaction between the components: at a brief exposure, the flavour overshadowed the odour ; at a long exposure, the flavour potentiated the odour (Experiment I I). The remaining experiments examined the mechanism subserving the potentiation effect. Experiment I11 demonstrated that extinction of the flavour associate of the odour attenuated the odour aversion but further conditioning of the flavour did not strengthen the odour aversion. Experiment IV confirmed this effect of extinction but also found a comparable attenuation of the odour aversion from extinction of a separately conditioned flavour. Experiment V examined the previous failure to influence the strength of the odour aversion by strengthening the flavour aversion. In this experiment, conditioning the flavour associate or a separately conditioned flavour with a more potent US augmented the strength of the odour aversion. The results did not provide support for the idea that the potentiation phenomenon reflects the formation of within-compound associations but did indicate that a potentiated odour aversion could be modulated by manipulations designed to alter the US representation.

The review revealed the complexity of individuals' attitudes toward donation and the need for more sophisticated future studies of the interactions between the broader factors influencing donation (such as social norms and existing legislation in each country) and individual factors, such as attitudes and beliefs. (Progress in Transplantation.