No abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of the recombinant allergen-specific IgE test could help to improve the selection of specific-allergen immunotherapy in polysensitized patients.

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only treatment that can affect the natural course of allergic diseases such as allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, and IgE-mediated food allergy. Adjuvants are used to induce a quicker, more potent, and longer-lasting immune response. Only 4 compounds are used as adjuvants in currently marketed AIT products: aluminum hydroxide, calcium phosphate, microcrystalline tyrosine (MCT), and monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL). The first 3 adjuvants are delivery systems with a depot effect, although they may also have immunomodulatory properties. These first-generation adjuvants are still widely used, especially aluminum hydroxide. However, aluminum is subject to limitations. MCT is the depot formulation of L-tyrosine; it enhances IgG production without inducing a significant increase in IgE, is biodegradable, and has good local and systemic tolerability. In turn, MPL is an immunostimulatory agent that is the only second-generation adjuvant currently used for AIT. In addition, multiple adjuvants are currently being studied, including immunostimulatory sequences (ISSs), nanoparticles (liposomes, virus-like particles, and biodegradable polymers), and phosphatidylserine derivatives. In a murine model of allergic bronchial inflammation by sensitization to olive pollen, the specific IgE level was significantly higher in sensitized mice treated with olive pollen and aluminum hydroxide. However, specific IgE levels were significantly reduced and bronchial hyperreactivity significantly improved in sensitized mice treated with olive pollen and bacterial derivatives (MPL or ISSs).

This retrospective study indicates that high-dose SLIT in children with rhinitis caused by house dust mites is well-tolerated and could be an effective treatment.

No abstract

The duration of AR in patients attended for the first time by specialists is long and, in general, the disease does not improve over time and is often not well controlled with pharmacologic interventions. Less than one-half of patients receive allergen-specific immunotherapy that is more often prescribed in HDM allergy.

Aim: Evaluate the effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy with Acarovac Plus® in a 1-year prospective multicentered real-life study. Methods: A total of 118 adults with allergic rhinitis sensitized to Dermatophagoides received subcutaneous immunotherapy with Acarovac Plus. Treatment outcomes were evaluated at baseline, 6 months and 1 year after treatment initiation. Primary end point was the evolution of the combined symptom and medication score. Secondary end points included other effectiveness outcomes and measurement of product tolerability. Results: Acarovac Plus induced significant improvements in primary and secondary end points after 6 months compared with baseline. These differences persisted after 1 year of treatment (p < 0.001; baseline vs 1 year): combined symptom and medication score (1.60 vs 0.79). No serious adverse events were recorded. Conclusion: Acarovac Plus for 1 year was effective and well tolerated in a real-life setting.

Paediatric patients treated by specialists for allergic rhinitis have moderate or severe disease. Symptomatic treatment was extensively prescribed but often did not achieve good disease control. Many specialists preferred a wait-and-see approach before prescribing immunotherapy.