No abstract

Much of Canada’s industrial sector is driven by natural resources and relies heavily on provisioning services supplied by the boreal zone. However, the sometimes intensive processes used by resource-based industries and their associated infrastructure have significantly altered the region, creating concerns over the future socio-ecological health of the boreal zone. Addressing these concerns will require industries reliant on natural resources from the boreal zone to innovate their processes, management, and infrastructure to improve extraction efficiency while contributing to society’s increasing expectations related to sustainability. Here, we explore past, current, and future trends in industrial innovation and infrastructure in the boreal zone for forestry, mining, pulp and paper, oil and gas, and renewable sources of power generation. We assess the role of innovation on the future socio-ecological state of the boreal zone by considering interactions between innovation in industry and infrastructure and other key drivers of change in the boreal, such as atmospheric changes, changing demands for nonprovisioning and provisioning ecosystem services, governance, and demographics and social values. We present future scenarios highlighting three divergent trajectories of change in boreal ecosystems based on past and current states of innovation in industry and infrastructure. We suggest that minimizing impacts of natural resource extraction activities in the boreal zone will only be possible through innovation directly focused on reducing the human footprint on the landscape. Innovation in the information technology sector related to process, management, and end products within these industries and placing greater emphasis on cross-sectoral collaboration will be key to achieving this goal.

Ecosystem‐level processes are increasingly used by researchers and managers as indicators of ecological integrity for bioassessment, particularly in streams. However, processes like litter breakdown integrate multiple mechanistic pathways, which can vary differentially even under natural, unimpacted conditions. In particular, weather‐driven hydrologic variations may strongly influence invertebrate shredder feeding and physical abrasion, inducing high natural variability of litter breakdown rates, which may obscure the effects of anthropogenic disturbances. Yet, such variability is rarely assessed to refine benchmarks of ecological status. Here, we quantified how interannual hydrologic differences contributed to the spatio‐temporal variability of litter breakdown rate and its components (fragmentation, λF; and dissolution and microbial decomposition, λm), in low‐order unimpacted, perennial streams across three climatically similar regions in temperate Canada. We measured litter breakdown rates in coarse (5 or 10 mm; kc)‐ and fine‐mesh (0.5 mm; kf) leaf bags during fall for 2–4 yr and used variance partitioning to disentangle the variation of kc, λF, and λm, as explained by hydrologic indices (during and prior to leaf bag incubation), decomposer‐related variables, and water chemistry. Contrary to our hypotheses, interannual hydrologic variability was unrelated to λF, and poorly predicted λm and kc within regions. Within‐region spatial (i.e., across sites in a year) and temporal (across years at a site) differences in kc approximated or exceeded the range of natural variability suggested to characterize reference conditions by a popular bioassessment framework. Accordingly, we recommend site‐ and region‐specific modifications of benchmarks for reference conditions that account for interannual variability, while cautioning about their potential non‐stationarity under climate change. Composite parameters such as kc/kf and λF/λm were substantially more variable across sites, and hence are not robust assessment parameters. As the range of natural variability of litter breakdown revealed in this study can overlap with the average impacts of certain anthropogenic disturbances (e.g., nutrient enrichment) on this parameter reported by previous research, we emphasize the need to include other structural and functional indicators to ensure comprehensive stream bioassessments.

This is the first study of the ecological significance of rocky breakwaters as habitat for intertidal biota in marine environments that freeze in winter. Percent cover of intertidal seaweeds and invertebrates was quantified on exposed (high wave action and winter ice scour) and sheltered sides of 18 breakwaters (> 5 yr old) and compared with 18 natural rocky intertidal areas along 430 km of the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence coast (Atlantic Canada) in the summer of 2010. Sheltered areas of breakwaters differed from natural rocky shores in having lower biotic richness and total abundance. However, these indices were not significantly different between habitat types for exposed areas. Multivariate analysis revealed significant differences in community composition between breakwaters and natural rocky shores in both sheltered and exposed areas. Ulva spp. (U. intestinalis and U. lactuca), Hildenbrandia rubra, and Mytilus edulis (exposed areas only) were more abundant on breakwaters than on natural rocky shores, while Semibalanus balanoides, Calothrix spp., Fucus spp., Chordaria flagelliformis (exposed areas only), and Ascophyllum nodosum (sheltered areas only) were less abundant on breakwaters. Our study shows that breakwaters from marine shores affected by winter sea ice support substantially different biotic communities than natural rocky intertidal areas. Thus, the findings of this study provide vital information for management decisions related to habitat loss and compensation when the coastal landscape is altered through the construction of breakwaters.

No abstract