2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-019-3907-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of wildfire and harvesting on aquatic and terrestrial invertebrate drift patterns in boreal headwater streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fire legacies, riparian vegetation, and CPOM Although upland vegetation destruction by fire can produce short-term inputs of sediment and solutes to streams, some of the long-term effects of wildfire appear to be mediated through fire effects on riparian vegetation (Arkle et al 2010, Musetta-Lambert et al 2019. Our results indicated that wildfire had greater effects on riparian than on upland vegetation in basins draining to sites that dried in 2016 (dry sites), presumably because of greater fuel loads in riparian than upland zones (as in some This is the author's accepted manuscript without copyediting, formatting, or final corrections.…”
Section: Wildfire Patterns: Long-term Responses Of Stream Ecosystems To Wildfirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fire legacies, riparian vegetation, and CPOM Although upland vegetation destruction by fire can produce short-term inputs of sediment and solutes to streams, some of the long-term effects of wildfire appear to be mediated through fire effects on riparian vegetation (Arkle et al 2010, Musetta-Lambert et al 2019. Our results indicated that wildfire had greater effects on riparian than on upland vegetation in basins draining to sites that dried in 2016 (dry sites), presumably because of greater fuel loads in riparian than upland zones (as in some This is the author's accepted manuscript without copyediting, formatting, or final corrections.…”
Section: Wildfire Patterns: Long-term Responses Of Stream Ecosystems To Wildfirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These predictions were based on two lines of evidence. First, in the same study area, Musetta‐Lambert et al, (, ) found that fire‐disturbed riparian forests had denser and more diverse woody‐stem vegetation communities, higher rates of litter export to streams, distinct litter composition inputs comprised of early‐successional species, and distinct and richer aquatic invertebrate communities in fire‐disturbed streams compared to undisturbed riparian areas. Second, fire‐disturbed riparian forests contribute litter species that are highly nutritional and labile (speckled alder and beaked hazel; Taylor et al, ) and thus are expected to breakdown faster.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While some exploration of site differences was made, we were not able to make overall generalisations about the differences between disturbance regimes due to low replication at the catchment level. We deployed all leaf litter mixtures in all catchments to account statistically for the potential effects of catchment‐level differences in invertebrate communities because Musetta‐Lambert et al, () and Musetta‐Lambert, Kreutzweiser, and Sibley () found greater percent shredders and unique shredder taxa at the fire‐disturbed sites than at reference sites, and these shredder‐related factors could influence leaf litter mixture colonisation and breakdown.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, densities of benthic macroinvertebrates remained higher for 15 to 20 years before returning to levels found in unburned catchments (Scrimgeour et al., 2001 ). In a boreal headwater stream, mayflies and caddisflies increased in drift for more than ten years after fire (Musetta‐Lambert et al., 2019 ).…”
Section: Wildfire Effects On Aquatic Faunamentioning
confidence: 99%