A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. The New England journal of medicine, 350 (1). pp. 21-8.

The S-ICD is an important new option for some patients. However, these data give cause for caution in light of the limited published data regarding clinical sensing capabilities, particularly among younger patients.

Physicians and/or patients tend toward a more conservative approach in female patients. Women are referred for ablation later than are men, after a longer duration of symptoms, and after having been given more antiarrhythmic drugs. However, potential concerns on behalf of physicians or female patients do not seem to be justified: ablation procedures in women had equally high success, low complication, and low recurrence rates as those procedures in male patients.

Targeting the slow pathway is an effective form of treatment for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. The technique has a high initial success rate, a low complication rate and a low recurrence rate at long-term follow-up. Slow pathway modification is associated with similar success rates and recurrence rates as slow pathway ablation and may confer theoretical long-term benefits.

The recurrence rate of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after successful radiofrequency ablation of accessory pathways shows an age-related increase, being low in patients younger than 50 years of age (12%) and high in the older patients: 35% in patients older than 50 years and 55% in patients older than 60. These results have significant therapeutic implications concerning the decisions on pharmacological therapy after successful ablation in patients older than 50 years. Furthermore, these data will help physicians advise older patients properly about their risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation after ablation.

No abstract

Aims Long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) is challenging to treat with suboptimal catheter ablation (CA) outcomes. Thoracoscopic surgical ablation (SA) has shown promising efficacy in atrial fibrillation (AF). This multicentre randomized controlled trial tested whether SA was superior to CA as the first interventional strategy in de novo LSPAF. Methods and results We randomized 120 LSPAF patients to SA or CA. All patients underwent predetermined lesion sets and implantable loop recorder insertion. Primary outcome was single procedure freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) ≥30 s without anti-arrhythmic drugs at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included clinical success (≥75% reduction in AF/AT burden); procedure-related serious adverse events; changes in patients’ symptoms and quality-of-life scores; and cost-effectiveness. At 12 months, freedom from AF/AT was recorded in 26% (14/54) of patients in SA vs. 28% (17/60) in the CA group [OR 1.128, 95% CI (0.46–2.83), P = 0.83]. Reduction in AF/AT burden ≥75% was recorded in 67% (36/54) vs. 77% (46/60) [OR 1.13, 95% CI (0.67–4.08), P = 0.3] in SA and CA groups, respectively. Procedure-related serious adverse events within 30 days of intervention were reported in 15% (8/55) of patients in SA vs. 10% (6/60) in CA, P = 0.46. One death was reported after SA. Improvements in AF symptoms were greater following CA. Over 12 months, SA was more expensive and provided fewer quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared with CA (0.78 vs. 0.85, P = 0.02). Conclusion Single procedure thoracoscopic SA is not superior to CA in treating LSPAF. Catheter ablation provided greater improvements in symptoms and accrued significantly more QALYs during follow-up than SA. Clinical Trial Registration ISRCTN18250790 and ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02755688

PEFA identifies HCM patients at risk of SCD with greater accuracy than non-invasive techniques and may have an important role in determining indications for ICD prescription.