The present study characterized the metabolic adaptation to persistent AF, unraveling a potential role for ketone bodies, and demonstrated that discordant metabolic alterations are evident in individuals susceptible to post-operative AF.
Aims
Long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) is challenging to treat with suboptimal catheter ablation (CA) outcomes. Thoracoscopic surgical ablation (SA) has shown promising efficacy in atrial fibrillation (AF). This multicentre randomized controlled trial tested whether SA was superior to CA as the first interventional strategy in de novo LSPAF.
Methods and results
We randomized 120 LSPAF patients to SA or CA. All patients underwent predetermined lesion sets and implantable loop recorder insertion. Primary outcome was single procedure freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) ≥30 s without anti-arrhythmic drugs at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included clinical success (≥75% reduction in AF/AT burden); procedure-related serious adverse events; changes in patients’ symptoms and quality-of-life scores; and cost-effectiveness. At 12 months, freedom from AF/AT was recorded in 26% (14/54) of patients in SA vs. 28% (17/60) in the CA group [OR 1.128, 95% CI (0.46–2.83), P = 0.83]. Reduction in AF/AT burden ≥75% was recorded in 67% (36/54) vs. 77% (46/60) [OR 1.13, 95% CI (0.67–4.08), P = 0.3] in SA and CA groups, respectively. Procedure-related serious adverse events within 30 days of intervention were reported in 15% (8/55) of patients in SA vs. 10% (6/60) in CA, P = 0.46. One death was reported after SA. Improvements in AF symptoms were greater following CA. Over 12 months, SA was more expensive and provided fewer quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared with CA (0.78 vs. 0.85, P = 0.02).
Conclusion
Single procedure thoracoscopic SA is not superior to CA in treating LSPAF. Catheter ablation provided greater improvements in symptoms and accrued significantly more QALYs during follow-up than SA.
Clinical Trial Registration
ISRCTN18250790 and ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02755688
Antibiotic concentrations in pulmonary tissue samples and plasma were studied in this open investigation. Twenty-nine patients scheduled for elective pulmonary surgery received a single oral dose of 500 mg azithromycin 24, 72, 96 or 120 h prior to the operation; two patients received 250 mg b.i.d. Blood samples were taken before and at the time of resection, and tissue was obtained during surgery. Plasma and tissue concentrations of azithromycin were measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and a microbiological bioassay. Only one patient had a detectable plasma concentration of azithromycin (0.13 micrograms/ml), measured 24 h post-dose by HPLC. However, high and sustained levels were found in lung tissue: mean concentrations measured by HPLC were 3.10 micrograms/g (SD +/- 2.17), 2.55 micrograms/g (SD +/- 1.36), 3.94 micrograms/g (SD +/- 2.40) and 3.13 micrograms/g (SD +/- 0.50) at 24, 72, 96 and 120 h, respectively. Bioassay results were similar to those for the HPLC assay. In summary, azithromycin levels in pulmonary tissue remained close to 3 micrograms/g for up to 5 days after a single oral 500 mg dose, in contrast to plasma levels which were much lower. The lung concentrations found are inhibitory for many sensitive respiratory pathogens and short-course azithromycin therapy is therefore a possibility.
We describe a rare complication of a complex chronic total occlusion recanalization procedure. Perforation of a distal right coronary artery collateral results in a left atrial intramural hematoma with consequent circulatory collapse. Access to prompt transoesophageal echocardiography and urgent surgical intervention were lifesaving and the case highlights possible implications on the planning of complex chronic total occlusion recanalization procedures.
These data demonstrate myocardial ischaemia secondary to CPB-CABG and OP-CABG to be a potent stimulator of vascular endothelial growth factor production, which may have implications for graft endothelialization and cardiovascular haemodynamics post-operatively.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.