Background Laboratory tests and early clinical studies have shown that highly cross-linked polyethylene (PE) markedly improves wear resistance compared to conventional PE. We evaluated this type of PE in two randomized clinical studies using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). The 2-and 3-year follow-up of these studies have already been reported. We found a lower penetration rate for the highly cross-linked PE than for conventional PE. We now report the outcome after 5 years.Patients and methods 60 patients (61 hips) with a median age of 55 years were randomized to receive either highly cross-linked PE (Durasul) or conventional cemented all-polyethylene sockets of the same design. 55 patients (56 hips) were followed for 5 years. In the second study, 32 patients (64 hips) with a median age of 48 years and with bilateral primary or secondary osteoarthritis of the hip had hybrid total hip arthroplasty with liners made of highly cross-linked PE (Longevity) on one side and conventional PE on the other. 23 patients in this study have passed the 5-year follow-up.Results Bedding-in and creep for the Durasul all-PE was reached by 2 years, and by 1 year for the Longevity liners. In both control groups with conventional PE, this was reached by 6 months. The steady-state wear rate was close to zero in the two study groups and 0.06 mm/ year for the conventional PE in the two control groups.Interpretation We found that use of highly crosslinked PE instead of conventional PE reduced the wear by more than 95%, which supports continued use of this type of PE in young, active patients.

Background Polyethylene (PE) wear particles are believed to cause aseptic loosening and thereby impair function in hip arthroplasty. Highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) has low short-and medium-term wear rates. However, the longterm wear characteristics are unknown and it is unclear whether reduced wear particle burden improves function and survival of cemented hip arthroplasty. Questions/purposes We asked whether XLPE wear rates remain low up to 10 years and whether this leads to improved implant fixation, periprosthetic bone quality, and clinical function compared to conventional PE. Methods We randomized 60 patients (61 hips) to receive either PE or XLPE cemented cups combined with a cemented stem. At 10 years postoperatively, 51 patients (52 hips) were evaluated for polyethylene wear and component migration estimation by radiostereometry, for radiolucent lines, bone densitometry, and Harris hip and pain scores. Revisions were recorded. Results XLPE cups had a lower mean three-dimensional wear rate between 2 and 10 years compared to conventional PE hips: 0.005 mm/year versus 0.056 mm/year. We found no differences in cup migration, bone mineral density, radiolucencies, functional scores, and revision rate. There was a trend toward improved stem fixation in the XLPE group. The overall stem failure rate was comparably high, without influencing wear rate in XLPE hips. Conclusions XLPE displayed a low wear rate up to 10 years when used in cemented THA, but we found no clear benefits in any other parameters. Further research is needed to determine whether cemented THA designs with XLPE are less prone to stem loosening.

No abstract

No abstract