Smart city urban development seems inevitable for the future of our cities, but who should decide what that future should be like and whose interest's smart urbanism serves? The 'Right to the City' calls for citizens as 'users' of cities to be integral parts to the socio-technological processes that shape urban space. This article explores how citizens can participate meaningfully, and whether data protection rights can be instrumental to this objective. It does so by analysing several smart city projects in Belgium and the Netherlands that were affected by the GDPR. The findings illustrate that data protection impacts smart city developments, but meaningful influence of citizens, as in the Right to the City, remains very limited. The article argues that already dominant actors and decision-makers remain in control of 'smart' urban developments, while citizens often lack awareness and data literacy. We suggest that participatory methods for citymaking are valuable if they bring about small, incremental changes and that researchers can play an active role in lowering barriers to meaningful participation in practice.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract