Abstract. Mean alongshore currents observed on two barred beaches are compared with predictions based on the one-dimensional, time-and depth-averaged alongshore momentum balance between forcing (by breaking waves, wind, and 10-100 km scale alongshore surface slopes), bottom stress, and lateral mixing. The observations span 500 hours at Egmond, Netherlands, and 1000 hours at Duck, North Carolina, and include a wide range of conditions with maximum mean currents of 1.4 m/s. Including rollers in the wave forcing results in improved predictions of the observed alongshore-current structure by shifting the predicted velocity maxima shoreward and increasing the velocity in the bar trough compared with model predictions without rollers. For these data, wave forcing balances the bottom stress within the surfzone, with the other terms of secondary importance. The good agreement between observations and predictions implies that the one-dimensional assumption holds for the range of conditions examined, despite the presence of small alongshore bathymetric nonuniformities. With stronger bathymetric variations the model skill deteriorates, particularly in the bar trough, consistent with earlier modeling and laboratory studies.

No abstract

Understanding and predicting the temporal variability of sediment grain size characteristics on high-energy beaches.

This review provides a critical, multi-faceted assessment of the practical contribution tidal stream energy can make to the UK and British Channel Islands future energy mix. Evidence is presented that broadly supports the latest national-scale practical resource estimate, of 34 TWh/year, equivalent to 11% of the UK’s current annual electricity demand. The size of the practical resource depends in part on the economic competitiveness of projects. In the UK, 124 MW of prospective tidal stream capacity is currently eligible to bid for subsidy support (MeyGen 1C, 80 MW; PTEC, 30 MW; and Morlais, 14 MW). It is estimated that the installation of this 124 MW would serve to drive down the levelized cost of energy (LCoE), through learning, from its current level of around 240   £ / MWh to below 150   £ / MWh , based on a mid-range technology learning rate of 17%. Doing so would make tidal stream cost competitive with technologies such as combined cycle gas turbines, biomass and anaerobic digestion. Installing this 124 MW by 2031 would put tidal stream on a trajectory to install the estimated 11.5 GW needed to generate 34 TWh/year by 2050. The cyclic, predictable nature of tidal stream power shows potential to provide additional, whole-system cost benefits. These include reductions in balancing expenditure that are not considered in conventional LCoE estimates. The practical resource is also dependent on environmental constraints. To date, no collisions between animals and turbines have been detected, and only small changes in habitat have been measured. The impacts of large arrays on stratification and predator–prey interaction are projected to be an order of magnitude less than those from climate change, highlighting opportunities for risk retirement. Ongoing field measurements will be important as arrays scale up, given the uncertainty in some environmental and ecological impact models. Based on the findings presented in this review, we recommend that an updated national-scale practical resource study is undertaken that implements high-fidelity, site-specific modelling, with improved model validation from the wide range of field measurements that are now available from the major sites. Quantifying the sensitivity of the practical resource to constraints will be important to establish opportunities for constraint retirement. Quantification of whole-system benefits is necessary to fully understand the value of tidal stream in the energy system.

No abstract