2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2006.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swash zone sediment dynamics: A comparison of a dissipative and an intermediate beach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 and 12 for cases 5-8) is more noticeable (with a larger berm and bar size) than that for the dissipative beaches, as shown in Figs. 11 (cases 1, 3, 9 and 11) and 12 (cases 2, 4, 10 and 12). This is consistent with the reduced magnitude, relative to an intermediate beach, of turbulence, flow velocity, momentum and wave energy after breaking that occurs on dissipative beaches during both the uprush and backwash (Miles et al, 2006). These results are also consistent with the field results of Miles et al (2006) and the numerical results of Bakhtyar et al (2010a).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 and 12 for cases 5-8) is more noticeable (with a larger berm and bar size) than that for the dissipative beaches, as shown in Figs. 11 (cases 1, 3, 9 and 11) and 12 (cases 2, 4, 10 and 12). This is consistent with the reduced magnitude, relative to an intermediate beach, of turbulence, flow velocity, momentum and wave energy after breaking that occurs on dissipative beaches during both the uprush and backwash (Miles et al, 2006). These results are also consistent with the field results of Miles et al (2006) and the numerical results of Bakhtyar et al (2010a).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is consistent with the reduced magnitude, relative to an intermediate beach, of turbulence, flow velocity, momentum and wave energy after breaking that occurs on dissipative beaches during both the uprush and backwash (Miles et al, 2006). These results are also consistent with the field results of Miles et al (2006) and the numerical results of Bakhtyar et al (2010a). They indicated that the sediment transport and concentrations are greater on intermediate beaches than on dissipative beaches.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…The bed level evolution is, therefore, the resultant of the small difference between the two components (Butt and Russell, 1999;Masselink et al, 2005). Masselink and Russell (2006) and Miles et al (2006) performed comparison of velocity and suspended sediment transport data obtained on a relatively Most of the available sediment transport data on the inner surf and swash zones rely on direct measurements from sediment traps (Alsina et al, 2009;Baldock et al, 2005;Jackson et al, 2004;Masselink and Hughes, 1998;Masselink et al, 2009) or co-located measures of suspended sediment concentration and velocity Alsina and Cáceres, 2011;Masselink et al, 2005;Puleo et al, 2000). Total load traps studies have evidenced a reasonable correlation of measured sediment mass and swash velocities and larger coefficients of proportionality during the uprush than during the backwash, hence, denoting higher transport efficiency during the uprush based on velocity transport concepts (Masselink and Hughes, 1998;Masselink et al, 2009).…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the incident swell energy is reduced over dissipative beaches (mildly sloping beaches with wide surf zones) and fringing reefs, while infragravity motions dominate the sea level and runup signals at the shoreline (Guza & Thorton 1982;Ruessink 1998;Miles et. al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%